2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.syapm.2014.10.007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Impact of short-term storage temperature on determination of microbial community composition and abundance in aerated forest soil and anoxic pond sediment samples

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
14
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
4
14
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Results for HXD consumption within the samples collected at a depth of 15 m (A and B) showed a similar degradation rate ( A = 5.94 mg HXD/L per day and B = 5.52 mg HXD/L per day), with 89.38% removal efficiency, compared to samples taken from 200 m depth (C and D) where the consumption rate was much slower ( C = 1.58 mg HXD/L per day and D = 0.76 mg HXD/L per day); nevertheless, the same removal efficiency rate was observed (93.44%). It was also observed that the storage temperature (−20 °C) did not affect the activity of HXD consumption in sediments, as reported by Rubin et al and Brandt et al…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 76%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Results for HXD consumption within the samples collected at a depth of 15 m (A and B) showed a similar degradation rate ( A = 5.94 mg HXD/L per day and B = 5.52 mg HXD/L per day), with 89.38% removal efficiency, compared to samples taken from 200 m depth (C and D) where the consumption rate was much slower ( C = 1.58 mg HXD/L per day and D = 0.76 mg HXD/L per day); nevertheless, the same removal efficiency rate was observed (93.44%). It was also observed that the storage temperature (−20 °C) did not affect the activity of HXD consumption in sediments, as reported by Rubin et al and Brandt et al…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 76%
“…Two samples from the coastal zone at a depth of 15 m and two from the oceanic zone at a depth of 200 m were taken (Figure ). Samples were kept frozen (−20 °C) until analyzed at CINVESTAV‐IPN, Merida laboratory; this temperature does not induce drastic changes in the composition and abundance of microbial communities as has been reported elsewhere …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The archaeal abundance of wet samples was comparable with the reported abundances in similar habitats like pond sediments (Brandt et al 2014), rich fen (Petersen et al 2012), and estuarine sediments (Webster et al 2015). By contrast, those of the dry samples (1.4 × 10 8 to 2.4 × 10 9 copies (g d.w.s.)…”
Section: Increase Of Archaeal Abundance After Water Floodingsupporting
confidence: 79%
“…Two important sample processing choices that may alter experimental results are (a) the type of soil storage method and (b) DNA extract thaw time, the length of time for which extracted DNA is transported and left to thaw. To date, only a handful of studies have examined consequences of soil storage methods on study results (i.e., temperature, absolute ethanol, freeze‐drying, RNAlater, PLFA) on targets such as DNA, RNA, bacteria, fungi, and arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi (Brandt, Breidenbach, Brenzinger, & Conrad, 2014; Cui et al, 2014; Harry, Gambier, & Garnier‐Sillam, 2000; Klammer, Mondini, & Insam, 2005; Lauber, Zhou, Gordon, Knight, & Fierer, 2010; Rissanen, Kurhela, Aho, Oittinen, & Tiirola, 2010; Rubin et al, 2013; Tzeneva et al, 2009; Weißbecker, Buscot, & Wubet, 2017). These studies have broadly found little impact of storage method, but they do not thoroughly explore common storage practices used in the field and focus overwhelmingly on bacteria.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%