2015
DOI: 10.1088/0960-1317/25/3/035025
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Impact of SiO2on Al–Al thermocompression wafer bonding

Abstract: Al-Al thermocompression bonding suitable for wafer level sealing of MEMS devices has been investigated. This paper presents a comparison of thermocompression bonding of Al films deposited on Si with and without a thermal oxide (SiO 2 film). Laminates of diameter 150 mm containing device sealing frames of width 200 µm were realized. The wafers were bonded by applying a bond force of 36 or 60 kN at bonding temperatures ranging from 300-550 °C for bonding times of 15, 30 or 60 minutes. The effects of these proces… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
25
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
25
0
Order By: Relevance
“…[17][18][19] It was found that Al films sputtered on SiO2 can be bonded at lower temperatures than those sputtered directly on Si wafers. 18 We also found that higher quality bonding in terms of dicing yield and bond strength can be achieved by increasing the bonding temperature and/or bond force.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…[17][18][19] It was found that Al films sputtered on SiO2 can be bonded at lower temperatures than those sputtered directly on Si wafers. 18 We also found that higher quality bonding in terms of dicing yield and bond strength can be achieved by increasing the bonding temperature and/or bond force.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[17][18][19] It was found that Al films sputtered on SiO2 can be bonded at lower temperatures than those sputtered directly on Si wafers. 18 We also found that higher quality bonding in terms of dicing yield and bond strength can be achieved by increasing the bonding temperature and/or bond force. 17 In the current work, we use transmission electron microscopy (TEM) to investigate bonded interfaces realized with Al deposited on Si or on SiO2 to explore possible reasons leading to differences in dicing yield.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When a layer of SiO2 was present below the Al, the bonding parameters could be reduced to 350 °C, 102 MPa and 15 min without a significant drop in dicing yield or strength [4]. As expected, higher temperatures, higher bond tool pressures or longer bonding times resulted in further increase in dicing yields and/or bond strengths.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 54%
“…As a calculation shows (4), the elastic energy is too low to influence the bonding between atoms directly, but the applied stress and the resulting strain breaks up the surface layer. The wafers are bonded at high temperatures, usually in the range of 400°C to 550°C (1)(2)(3)(5)(6)(7). In recent experiments, Malik et al were able to reduce the required bonding temperature to about 300°C by depositing the Al metallization layer onto an intermediate SiO2 layer (3).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The wafers are bonded at high temperatures, usually in the range of 400°C to 550°C (1)(2)(3)(5)(6)(7). In recent experiments, Malik et al were able to reduce the required bonding temperature to about 300°C by depositing the Al metallization layer onto an intermediate SiO2 layer (3). In the references listed in TABLE I, typically temperature of 400°C-550°C led to bonded Al-Al wafers with Al2O3 precipitates present at the bonded interface and still with reasonably good bonding quality.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%