2015
DOI: 10.1111/liv.12809
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Impact of skin capsular distance on the performance of controlled attenuation parameter in patients with chronic liver disease

Abstract: Background & AimsControlled attenuation parameter (CAP) is a non‐invasive method for evaluating hepatic steatosis. However, larger skin capsular distance (SCD) can affect the accuracy. The aim of this study was to investigate the impact of SCD on the diagnostic performance of CAP and liver stiffness measurement (LSM).MethodsOf 101 patients with non‐alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) and 280 patients with chronic hepatitis B (CHB) who underwent liver biopsy were prospectively recruited. CAP, LSM and SCD were… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
71
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 78 publications
(73 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
2
71
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Notably, the first can potentially affect stiffness influencing the architectural structure of the liver, thus changing the propagation time of the vibratory wave through the liver . Similarly, obesity is associated with a higher skin‐to‐liver distance of the hepatic capsula, and the presence of nonhepatic tissue in the volume explored by the M probe might increase stiffness values …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Notably, the first can potentially affect stiffness influencing the architectural structure of the liver, thus changing the propagation time of the vibratory wave through the liver . Similarly, obesity is associated with a higher skin‐to‐liver distance of the hepatic capsula, and the presence of nonhepatic tissue in the volume explored by the M probe might increase stiffness values …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In comparison, we found backscatter coefficient values to be significantly different in pairwise comparisons of grades 1–3, and the attenuation coefficient was significantly different between all grades except 2 versus 3. Second, the accuracy of the controlled attenuation parameter decreases in obese subjects when compared with nonobese subjects [23], and the technical failure rate associated with obesity can be as high as 33% [26]. In comparison, although most patients included in our QUS study were obese, the technical failure rate was only 1.6% (1/61), suggesting that QUS may be more robust for obese subjects than the controlled attenuation parameter.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1). From the initial cohorts, only patients with reliable liver stiffness measurement (LSM) [12], single-proton magnetic resonance spectroscopy ( 1 H-MRS) [13] and elevated hepatic fat content defined by CAP ≥ 248 dB/m [7] were included in final analysis.
Fig. 1Definition of the patient cohort.
…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%