2015
DOI: 10.1373/clinchem.2014.230656
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Impact of Smoothing on Parameter Estimation in Quantitative DNA Amplification Experiments

Abstract: BACKGROUND: Quantification cycle (Cq) and amplification efficiency (AE) are parameters mathematically extracted from raw data to characterize quantitative PCR (qPCR) reactions and quantify the copy number in a sample. Little attention has been paid to the effects of preprocessing and the use of smoothing or filtering approaches to compensate for noisy data. Existing algorithms largely are taken for granted, and it is unclear which of the various methods is most informative. We investigated the effect of smooth… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
25
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
0
25
0
Order By: Relevance
“…F 1…10 ) and then subtract this value from all fluorescence values prior to parameter estimation. Consequently, most of the published quantification algorithms conduct this data transformation18, along with other pre-processing steps such as smoothing or filtering19.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…F 1…10 ) and then subtract this value from all fluorescence values prior to parameter estimation. Consequently, most of the published quantification algorithms conduct this data transformation18, along with other pre-processing steps such as smoothing or filtering19.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…And it based on a 2-fold dilution series of cDNA (1 : 5, 1 : 10, 1 : 10, 1 : 10, 1 : 20, and 1 : 40). The corresponding qPCR efficiencies (E) were calculated refer to the formula E = 10 -1/slope -1 (Pfaffl 2001;Tellinghuisen 2014;Spiess et al 2015Spiess et al , 2016. Each sample was prepared as two biological replicates, and each reaction was analysed with three technical replications.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since mRNA quality is crucial [16], we decided to check obtained cDNA by applying qPCR on representative target genes ADRB1, cTnT, GAPDH, SERCA2, SCN5A, MLC-2v and MLC-2a (Table 2). A qPCR reaction mixture included 250 nM of each dNTP, 0.25 M primer (sequences see Table 3), 20-50 ng template cDNA, 1 × PCR buffer, 2.5 mM • C. Raw data were exported as comma-separated values and processed using RKWard (v. 0.6.5) [17] as described [18][19][20][21]. For melting curve analysis dedicated functionality from the MBmca package [22] (v. 0.0.3-4) was used.…”
Section: Rna Isolation and Cdna Synthesismentioning
confidence: 99%