2021
DOI: 10.1109/access.2021.3083638
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Impact of SMOTE on Imbalanced Text Features for Toxic Comments Classification Using RVVC Model

Abstract: Social media platforms and microblogging websites have gained accelerated popularity during the past few years. These platforms are used for expressing views and opinions about products, personalities, and events. Often during discussions and debates, fights take place on social media platforms which involves using rude, disrespectful, and hateful comments called toxic comments. The identification of toxic comments has been regarded as an essential element for social media platforms. This study introduces an e… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
63
0
6

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 131 publications
(69 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
0
63
0
6
Order By: Relevance
“…SV works based on probability of each class as predicted by each model and these probabilities pass through average criteria. In the end, the argmax function is used to average the probabilities to compute the final prediction [58]. In SV model, X 1 , X 2 , and X − 3 are the probabilities by XGB for class 1 (C 1 ), class 2 (C 2 ), and class 3 (C 3 ).…”
Section: Proposed Hard Voting and Soft Voting Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…SV works based on probability of each class as predicted by each model and these probabilities pass through average criteria. In the end, the argmax function is used to average the probabilities to compute the final prediction [58]. In SV model, X 1 , X 2 , and X − 3 are the probabilities by XGB for class 1 (C 1 ), class 2 (C 2 ), and class 3 (C 3 ).…”
Section: Proposed Hard Voting and Soft Voting Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With the help of confusion matrix performance of proposed model is analysed. The performance of proposed model is analysed using accuracy, precision, recall and f-measure ( Rupapara et al, 2021 ; Jamil et al, 2021 ; Rustam et al, 2021 ). These parameters can be measured with the help of following formulae where TP represents true positives, TN is true negatives, FP shows false positives and FN shows false negatives.…”
Section: Experimental Results Evaluation and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Evaluation parameters are used to evaluate the performance of models including precision, F1 Score, recall, and accuracy [51]. These are the commonly used evaluation metrics.…”
Section: Performance Evaluation Criteriamentioning
confidence: 99%