2020
DOI: 10.18402/resci.2020.12.08
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Impact of social norms and public supervision on the willingness and behavior of farming households to participate in rural living environment improvement: Empirical analysis based on generalized continuous ratio model

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…IRHS relates to the supply of public goods and is also concerned with the characteristics of private goods because the government attends to IRHS while the farmers contribute to the improvement of the environment around their houses. Farmers' participation in IRHS is guided by the government to promote the appearance of villages and, taking the periphery of rural households as the model, to attend to the centralized treatment of domestic waste and domestic sewage, human and animal waste treatment, environmental greening, debris management, and other activities [10,18]. Although IRHS covers a range of features, depending on the rural reality, this study mainly focuses on two aspects: the centralized treatment of domestic waste and domestic sewage.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…IRHS relates to the supply of public goods and is also concerned with the characteristics of private goods because the government attends to IRHS while the farmers contribute to the improvement of the environment around their houses. Farmers' participation in IRHS is guided by the government to promote the appearance of villages and, taking the periphery of rural households as the model, to attend to the centralized treatment of domestic waste and domestic sewage, human and animal waste treatment, environmental greening, debris management, and other activities [10,18]. Although IRHS covers a range of features, depending on the rural reality, this study mainly focuses on two aspects: the centralized treatment of domestic waste and domestic sewage.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the process of participating in environmental governance and implementing various PEB, people will not only be affected by their own environmental attitude, but also by their satisfaction with government governance. If people are more satisfied with the government's environmental governance, and has more confidence on the effects of environmental policy instruments, they will have relatively strong intention to participate in environmental governance, and relatively large possibility to implement PEB as well [28]. Consequently, environmental attitude was devided into citizens' attitude towards environmental protection and public satisfaction with the government's environmental governance in this paper and proposed the following hypothesis: -H2 Environmental attitude has a positive impact on public sphere pro-environmental behavior.…”
Section: Impact Of Environmental Awareness On Publicmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Depending on the findings of these studies, the factors affecting rural residents' willingness to participate in improving their rural living environments were divided into external factors at the objective level and internal factors at the subjective level. In terms of objective-level influencing factors, the main factors are institutional incentives and constraints (Maryia et al, 2015), social norms (Sun et al, 2020), and information supply (Starr and Nicolson, 2015). In terms of the influencing factors of rural residents' subjective level, the main factors are environmental cognition (Sun, 2019), demographic characteristics (Miafodzyeva and Brandt, 2013), and transportation conditions (Liu and Huang, 2014).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%