2002
DOI: 10.1016/s1164-5563(02)01148-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Impact of soil compaction on earthworm burrow systems using X-ray computed tomography: preliminary study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
35
0
3

Year Published

2011
2011
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 68 publications
(39 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
1
35
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…3a), which generate macropores that significantly impact water infiltration and thus are important for supplying crops with water, as well as controlling surface runoff and erosion. Burrowing is driven by earthworm activities such as feeding, reaction to drought or cold temperatures, avoidance of predators, and soil oxygenation (Jegou et al 2002). Pore morphology varies depending on the earthworm ecological group.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…3a), which generate macropores that significantly impact water infiltration and thus are important for supplying crops with water, as well as controlling surface runoff and erosion. Burrowing is driven by earthworm activities such as feeding, reaction to drought or cold temperatures, avoidance of predators, and soil oxygenation (Jegou et al 2002). Pore morphology varies depending on the earthworm ecological group.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…From the scarce examples of ecological studies, the most studied animals have been arthropods and annelids, and in a lesser extend other kingdoms such as plants and fungi (Figure 3). It is particularly evident that one of the most popular topics so far is soil ecology (Davey et al., 2011; Harrison, Gardner, Tollner, & Kinard, 1993; Tollner, 1991), and specifically the study of worm burrows (Amossé, Turberg, Kohler‐Milleret, Gobat, & Le Bayon, 2015; Auclerc, Capowiez, Guérold, & Nahmani, 2013; Capowiez, Monestiez, & Belzunces, 2001; Capowiez, Pierret, & Moran, 2003; Francis, Tabley, Butler, & Fraser, 2001; Jégou, Capowiez, & Cluzeau, 2001; Jégou, Cluzeau, Hallaire, Balesdent, & Tréhen, 2000; Jégou, Cluzeau, Wolf, Gandon, & Tréhen, 1998; Jégou, Hallaire, Cluzeau, & Tréhen, 1999; Jégou et al., 2002; Langmaack, Schrader, Rapp‐Bernhardt, & Kotzke, 1999; Pagenkemper et al., 2015; Pelosi, Grandeau, & Capowiez, 2017; Rogasik, Schrader, Onasch, Kiesel, & Gerke, 2014; Schrader, Rogasik, Onasch, & Jegou, 2007), mostly because of the ease of studying this type of sample. Soil can be considered a matrix where the components can be detected through X‐ray CT without any preparation (i.e., staining).…”
Section: Application Of X‐ray Computed Tomography In Ecological Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There is a huge variety of image processing and image analysis methods that are all tailored for the ultimate goal to quantify the complex, structural heterogeneity based on a few meaningful parameters (Kaestner et al, 2008;Vogel et al, 2010;Schlüter et al, 2014). The changes in the internal structure can be assessed statistically, e.g., by comparing the pore size distribution or pore connectivity averaged over different samples at two points in time (Jégou et al, 2002;Schlüter et al, 2011). Evidently, spatially explicit information about the internal displacement of particles or aggregates is excluded from analysis in such an approach.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%