2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.07.061
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Impact of solid waste treatment from spray dryer absorber on the levelized cost of energy of a coal-fired power plant

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0
2

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
4
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Findings showed that without expecting any profit (NPV = 0), the sale price of electricity for the GT option was US$0.1077 per kWh. An LCOE range of US$0.092–0.095 per kWh was reported for a coal power plant, which indicates that the economic performance of a biofueled MGT is slightly higher than that of a conventional thermal power plant. The difference in the values of LCOE would be even higher if profit were considered (NPV > 0).…”
Section: Biofuel Utilization In Gt Cyclesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Findings showed that without expecting any profit (NPV = 0), the sale price of electricity for the GT option was US$0.1077 per kWh. An LCOE range of US$0.092–0.095 per kWh was reported for a coal power plant, which indicates that the economic performance of a biofueled MGT is slightly higher than that of a conventional thermal power plant. The difference in the values of LCOE would be even higher if profit were considered (NPV > 0).…”
Section: Biofuel Utilization In Gt Cyclesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The main goal is support decision-making on process configurations to monetize mixed coal combustion products from a 360 MW pulverized coal power plant with semi-dry FGD. A gate-to-gate life cycle assessment is performed, considering three scenarios: BASE -standard power plant [33], CASE I -base plant adopting dry thermal oxidation treatment of spray dryer solids, CASE IIbypass of desulfurization system. Cases I and II allow commercialization of the solid residue as class C fly-ash.…”
Section: Goal and Scopementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The power plant is supplied with Colombian Coal, with composition assumed as similar to Colombian field IGM 1238 [34]. The considered set of reactions expected to occur inside the FBR and the SDA solid residue composition and mass flow is presented by Cruz et al [33]. The last was obtained from the heat and mass balances of the power plant used as case study and considers coal with 1.5%w/w of sulfur.…”
Section: Heat and Mass Balances And Streams Inventorymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nesse sistema é utilizado carvão de baixo teor de enxofre, em virtude de um limite de até 95% de eficiência de remoção de SO 2 . [10] A tecnologia semisseca é interessante em regiões onde o abastecimento de água é limitado (por exemplo, o Nordeste do Brasil e Oeste dos Estados Unidos), porque consome de 30 a 40% menos água do que o processo FGD tipo úmido. Em termos de despesas de capital, o custo de um processo FGD semisseco é cerca de 60% menor do que a tecnologia úmida [10].…”
Section: Introductionunclassified
“…[10] A tecnologia semisseca é interessante em regiões onde o abastecimento de água é limitado (por exemplo, o Nordeste do Brasil e Oeste dos Estados Unidos), porque consome de 30 a 40% menos água do que o processo FGD tipo úmido. Em termos de despesas de capital, o custo de um processo FGD semisseco é cerca de 60% menor do que a tecnologia úmida [10]. Dentro do reator do processo semisseco, a água evapora, aumentando a umidade do ambiente e reduzindo a temperatura do gás de combustão garantindo a dispersão do hidróxido de cálcio em partículas finas, uma vez que as gotículas são secas.…”
Section: Introductionunclassified