2012
DOI: 10.1364/ol.37.000650
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Impact of spectral phase mismatch on femtosecond coherent beam combining systems

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the best case, a value of 1 is achievable and, therefore, a result as close as possible to 1 is desired. Hereby, smaller differences between the channels lead to a higher achievable combination efficiency [15], [22], [23]. A high combination efficiency also has consequences for the combined emission.…”
Section: General Considerationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the best case, a value of 1 is achievable and, therefore, a result as close as possible to 1 is desired. Hereby, smaller differences between the channels lead to a higher achievable combination efficiency [15], [22], [23]. A high combination efficiency also has consequences for the combined emission.…”
Section: General Considerationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the time domain, some care is required to balance the amount of group-velocity dispersion introduced by each arm, and a tunable delay line is usually included in each arm to fine-tune the group delay. In highly nonlinear systems (B>π rad), the amount of accumulated nonlinear phase should also be matched to maximize combining efficiency (Daniault et al 2012a(Daniault et al , 2012b. It is worthwhile to point out that the polarization state at the output of amplifiers must also be fixed, which can be guaranteed by the use of polarization-maintaining fibers.…”
Section: Spatial: Coherent Beam Combiningmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The similar difficulty is a necessity of providing a high degree of the spatial overlapping of 10 (3−4) elementary Gaussian beams amplified inside fiber array in a sequence of 10 (3−4) demultiplexing (beam combining) beamsplitters. The more serious complications are due to nonlinear selfphase modulation (SPM or B-integral discrepancy) [13] and temporal envelope transformation because of gain saturation of laser amplifiers [14]. The nanosecond laser pulses with exponential envelope sech(t − zn 0 /c) move in a self-similar style with superluminal envelope speed while Gaussian pulses demonstrate self-steepening of pre- MO is master ocillator, CPA is chirped pulse amplifying array, BS fiber [1] is entrance beamsplitter tree, which may be both free space and fiber array, M are ordinary retro-mirrors, BST is free-space output binary BS tree [9,11], λ 3 T is target of volume λ 3 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%