2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2014.09.016
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Impact of sperm morphology on the likelihood of pregnancy after intrauterine insemination

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
22
0
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 41 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
2
22
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…By detecting the fact that the success rate of pregnancy decreases when normal sperm morphology is <30% or motile sperm count is < 5x106 and the patient is a woman over 35, Badawy et al [5] pointed out in their study, which involved 714 IUI cycles and analyzed the effects of sperm count and morphology on the success of IUI, that morphology and motility are important. While these studies support our findings, Deveneau et al [13] argued in their retrospective study comprising 856 IUI cycles that sperm morphology lower than 4% was not related to low pregnancy rates of the patients undergoing IUI, and morphology could not be the only parameter to determine use of IVF method. Similarly, Krabinus and Gelety [14] did not identify any difference in the pregnancy rates even when the samples of morphology that were 4% or 30% worse than 4% were evaluated in their study of 538 IUI cycles.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 88%
“…By detecting the fact that the success rate of pregnancy decreases when normal sperm morphology is <30% or motile sperm count is < 5x106 and the patient is a woman over 35, Badawy et al [5] pointed out in their study, which involved 714 IUI cycles and analyzed the effects of sperm count and morphology on the success of IUI, that morphology and motility are important. While these studies support our findings, Deveneau et al [13] argued in their retrospective study comprising 856 IUI cycles that sperm morphology lower than 4% was not related to low pregnancy rates of the patients undergoing IUI, and morphology could not be the only parameter to determine use of IVF method. Similarly, Krabinus and Gelety [14] did not identify any difference in the pregnancy rates even when the samples of morphology that were 4% or 30% worse than 4% were evaluated in their study of 538 IUI cycles.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 88%
“…On the other hand, a recent study by Deveneau et al . showed that there is no statistically significant difference in ongoing pregnancy rate when comparing patients with strict sperm morphology ≤4% versus >4% in IUI cycles . According to our results, insemination performed at least 36 h after hCG administration may be beneficial for couples with either sperm morphology ≤4% or >4%.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 51%
“…In another study Check et al divided patients into the three groups as sperm with normal morphology ratio <4%, 4-15% and >15% and obtained pregnancy rates as 30%, 26% and 20% respectively and they concluded that there was no positive correlation between pregnancy rate and morphological normal sperm ratio (13). Deveneau et al reported that there is no statistically significant difference in per cycle pregnancy rates when comparing patients with a strict sperm morphology of ≤4% versus >4% who undergo IUI (16). In our study we also observed that morphology alone does not result significant difference on pregnancy rate.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%