2014
DOI: 10.1007/s00468-014-1137-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Impact of stand density on tree morphology and growth stresses in young beech (Fagus sylvatica L.) stands

Abstract: Key message According to biomechanical processes, tree morphology (trunk inclination, height-to-diameter ratio and crown area) explains statistically silvicultural effects on growth stress variation. Abstract Growth stresses constitute the main mechanism allowing the tree to control its posture against its mechanical environment, but are also among the most important factors contributing to the depreciation of timber value. This study aimed at assessing the link between stand planting density and growth stress… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the long-term unmanaged stand, SZ, very high values of stand basal area and stand volume accumulated (59 m 2 ha −1 , and 903 m 3 ha −1 , respectively [19]). It is well known that a high growing stock, accompanied by high stand densities and a closed canopy, strongly impacts crown dimensions [16,38,39]. This explains the significantly different values in several crown morphological traits in SZ compared to the other stands.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…In the long-term unmanaged stand, SZ, very high values of stand basal area and stand volume accumulated (59 m 2 ha −1 , and 903 m 3 ha −1 , respectively [19]). It is well known that a high growing stock, accompanied by high stand densities and a closed canopy, strongly impacts crown dimensions [16,38,39]. This explains the significantly different values in several crown morphological traits in SZ compared to the other stands.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…The growth and development of beech stands are significantly influenced by various factors, such as site and environmental factors (Pichler et al, 2009;Vacek & Hejcman, 2012;Bošeľa et al, 2016;; stand structure and competition (Jullien et al, 2013;Vacek et al, 2014aVacek et al, , 2015aVacek et al, , 2015bDassot et al, 2015;Bulušek et al, 2016), genetic characteristics including species provenance (Hansen et al, 2003;Gömöry & Paule, 2011;Gömöry et al, 2013), and management intervention (Barna et al, 2010;Ratnam et al, 2014;Westergren et al, 2015). Natural or anthropogenic disturbances (Zeibig et al, 2005;Fichtner et al, 2012;Vacek et al, 2014b;Králíček et al, 2017) and masting behavior of the species also influence the growth and development of the stands (Piovesan & Adams, 2001;Drobyshev et al, 2010;Vacek et al, 2017b).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Crop trees were selected according to strictly defined criteria at the age between 40 to 60 years, (after two or three interventions; except for the control subplot) and those published by Štefančík (1984) -stem quality, stem and crown dimension and spacing. Regarding the crown shape, trees with the continuous type of crown were selected as these are the most suitable from the morphological point of view (Vacek 1987;Woodcock et al 1995;Dassot et al 2015). When conducting thinning from below, the crown level remained unaffected.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%