2023
DOI: 10.1136/jnis-2023-020382
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Impact of stent-retriever tip design on distal embolization during mechanical thrombectomy: a randomized in vitro evaluation

Abstract: BackgroundRepeated number of passes, clot fragmentation, and distal embolization during mechanical thrombectomy (MT) lead to worse clinical outcomes in acute ischemic stroke. This study aimed to assess the recanalization and embolic outcomes of different stent-retrievers (SRs): open-tip SR (Solitaire X 6×40 mm), closed-tip SR (EmboTrap II 5×33 mm), and filter-tip SR (NeVa NET 5.5×37 mm).MethodsStiff-friable clot analogs were used to create middle cerebral artery (M1-MCA) occlusions in a benchtop model. After o… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

1
0
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 29 publications
(34 reference statements)
1
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Similarly, the closed nature of the distal end of the Stream device's braided net may also act as a distal clot catcher that prevents, at least to a degree, the loss of distal thrombi during the expansion of the device, as was recently demonstrated with another device [33]. Interestingly, in our study, distal emboli were only seen in 5.9% of cases despite having been reported in ≈25% of cases for devices with distal clot catchers [12].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 68%
“…Similarly, the closed nature of the distal end of the Stream device's braided net may also act as a distal clot catcher that prevents, at least to a degree, the loss of distal thrombi during the expansion of the device, as was recently demonstrated with another device [33]. Interestingly, in our study, distal emboli were only seen in 5.9% of cases despite having been reported in ≈25% of cases for devices with distal clot catchers [12].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 68%