2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.cptl.2018.03.009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Impact of student to student peer mentoring program in first year of pharmacy program

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Similar to previous university peer mentoring programs, (i.e., Dennehy & Dasgupta, 2017 ; Etzel et al, 2018 ; Yomtov et al, 2017 ), the current model holds promise for cross-age peer mentoring models at the college level. While many peer mentoring programs focus solely on facilitating strong mentoring relationships, the current initiative integrated aspects of supportive accountability, digital interventions, and stepped-care approaches.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 55%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Similar to previous university peer mentoring programs, (i.e., Dennehy & Dasgupta, 2017 ; Etzel et al, 2018 ; Yomtov et al, 2017 ), the current model holds promise for cross-age peer mentoring models at the college level. While many peer mentoring programs focus solely on facilitating strong mentoring relationships, the current initiative integrated aspects of supportive accountability, digital interventions, and stepped-care approaches.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 55%
“…Although peer support may help bridge gaps in access to student support services, many young college students still struggle to find or recruit a peer mentor within their social networks (Gowdy et al, 2020 ), hence increasing the popularity of formal mentoring programs at university settings. There is an abundance of research supporting the potential formal cross-age mentoring programs hold, including for college adjustment (Etzel et al, 2018 ), student motivation (Dennehy & Dasgupta, 2017 ), and psychosocial outcomes (i.e. connectedness; Yomtov et al, 2017 ).…”
Section: Improving Support Systems With Peer Mentorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Collings et al (2014) also found that peer mentoring moderated the effects of the transition to university in terms of social support, positive affect and self-esteem. Etzel et al (2018), too, found that a peer mentoring programme aided pharmacy students in their adjustment during their first year. In a recent study done in South Africa, Joorst (2021) found that the guidance and support offered by mentors assisted first-year students in a bridging course to adjust to university.…”
Section: Peer Mentoring and Adjustmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Numerous studies indicate a positive relationship between adjustment and attrition (Abdullah et al, 2010;Credé & Niehorster, 2012;Gerdes & Mallinckrodt, 1994;Krotseng, 1992), hence the primary purpose of peer mentoring programmes is often to assist students with adjustment during the first year (Collings et al, 2014;Allen et al, 1999;Grant-Vallone & Eshner, 2000;Treston, 1999), as a means of improving retention. Various studies have reported peer mentoring programmes as being effective in buffering the transition from school to university for first-year students (Collings et al, 2014;Etzel et al, 2018;Swart et al, 2019). In their qualitative study, Swart et al (2019) found that first-year engineering students who participated in a peer mentoring programme, reported that the programme assisted them in adapting to the higher education environment.…”
Section: Peer Mentoring and Adjustmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many researches show the importance of coursemate relationships and contexts that lie between friendship networks and study results (Frank et al, 2008;Payne & Cornwell, 2007). For this reason, universities often introduce mentoring programmes, with mentors being senior students who focus on the wellbeing of students and the integration and retention of students in the university's life (Etzel et al, 2018). However, as pointed out by T. Brodaty and M. Gurgand (2016), the influence of coursemates on the study process has been little researched.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%