2014
DOI: 10.1111/roiw.12158
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Impact of Taxes and Benefits on Inequality among Groups of Income Units

Abstract: This paper analyzes the redistributive impact of the fiscal system and simultaneously explains how each tax and benefit instrument satisfies the principles of vertical and horizontal equity within and across different groups of income units. The decompositions of the redistributive effect are based on new axioms concerning the vertical and horizontal equity of the overall fiscal system, including taxes and benefits. The method is based on pairwise comparisons of income units and the “micro” concepts of income … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Early work using 2007 data highlighted the relatively high pre-fiscal income inequality in Croatia and despite the relatively large redistributive effect of the policies, these were still less redistributive compared to Slovenia (Čok et al, 2012). In particular, earlier work using data for 2010 emphasized the fact that horizontal inequities arising from the benefit system dampened to some extent the redistributive role of fiscal policy (Urban 2014 and2016). More recent work has been done in the context of a broader effort to build microsimulation models in the EU through EUROMOD (Urban and Bezeredi, 2016).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Early work using 2007 data highlighted the relatively high pre-fiscal income inequality in Croatia and despite the relatively large redistributive effect of the policies, these were still less redistributive compared to Slovenia (Čok et al, 2012). In particular, earlier work using data for 2010 emphasized the fact that horizontal inequities arising from the benefit system dampened to some extent the redistributive role of fiscal policy (Urban 2014 and2016). More recent work has been done in the context of a broader effort to build microsimulation models in the EU through EUROMOD (Urban and Bezeredi, 2016).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recent research on income inequality has emphasized, inter alia , the nexus surrounding the quality of democracy alongside its persistence and income inequality with the moderating effect of foreign direct investment (Wong, 2015); the redistributive effect of fiscal policy through a tax on income inequality and opportunities disparity (Alves & Afonso, 2019; Cano, 2018; Ilzetzki, 2018; Iosifidi & Mylonidis, 2017; Odusola, 2017; Pástor & Veronesi, 2016; Urban, 2016); the extent of democracy and income disparity with the redistribution channel by which political freedom influences the inequality (Acemoglu et al, 2015; Islam, 2016); the importance of tax optimization for industrial pollution control on income inequality (Bontems & Gozlan, 2018); the nexus between income inequality reduction through tax policy and economic growth (Biswas et al, 2017); and how the democratic structure could facilitate the relationship between the natural resources and income inequality (Hartwell et al, 2019). In their study on post‐communist economies, Gerry and Mickiewicz (2008) investigated what factors contribute to income inequality.…”
Section: Theoretical Highlights and Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Firstly, as a result of the minimal level of resources or income raised from their economic activities, they are unable to adequately pay up their debts (Lin & Jia, 2019;Martorano, 2016). Secondly, income raised is subject to the fact that tax liability is not equally distributed, the majority of the tax liability is incurred by the disadvantaged group usually based on the actions of the advantaged group (Ivica, 2016;Kennedy et al, 2017;Stantcheva, 2020). Also, the problem of Accountability in policies that make the tax payers feel a sense of unfairness (Gbato, 2017).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%