2006
DOI: 10.1016/s0022-5347(05)00433-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Impact of the 1998 World Health Organization/International Society of Urological Pathology Classification System for Urothelial Neoplasms of the Kidney

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
1

Year Published

2006
2006
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
7
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In contrast, aberrant squamous and/or glandular differentiation in otherwise typical urothelial cancers is by far more common, occurring in 7-60% of bladder [1,9,22,26,29,30,42,45] and 10-15% of upper urinary tract UCs [7,11]. In our series, squamous or glandular differentiation occurred in 74/268 (28%) upper urinary tract tumors, its presence being significantly correlated with high tumor stage and grade.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 51%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In contrast, aberrant squamous and/or glandular differentiation in otherwise typical urothelial cancers is by far more common, occurring in 7-60% of bladder [1,9,22,26,29,30,42,45] and 10-15% of upper urinary tract UCs [7,11]. In our series, squamous or glandular differentiation occurred in 74/268 (28%) upper urinary tract tumors, its presence being significantly correlated with high tumor stage and grade.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 51%
“…These areas are most frequently squamous or glandular in nature and their frequency was shown to increase with tumor grade and stage [1,11,42,43,45]. Thus, most urological oncologists share the view that mixed histology implies more aggressive disease, which may be less susceptible to radio-or chemotherapy [16,25,29].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the 2004 WHO/ISUP system, however, these grade 2 tumors can be segregated approximately equally into lowand high-grade carcinomas with correspondingly low and high risks of progression. [9][10][11] Several studies have compared the 1973 WHO and newer WHO/ISUP systems. Most have demonstrated a superiority of the WHO/ISUP system in predicting recurrence and progression as well as inter-observer reproducibility, 9,[12][13][14] whereas several others have reported no difference in interobserver reproducibility between two grading systems.…”
Section: Relationship Of 1973 Who To 2004 Who/isup Systemsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…H&E-stained slides were used to assess histological grade (low and high grade) 21 , pathologic stage (pT) 22 , growth of tumor (papillary/solid), multifocality, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI). Authors compared low stage non-muscle invasive tumor (pTapT1) and high stage muscle invasive (pT2-pT4) tumor 23 .…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%