2004
DOI: 10.1603/0046-225x-33.5.1306
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Impact of the Activity of Dung Beetles (Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae: Scarabaeinae) Inhabiting Pasture Land in Durango, Mexico

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
29
2
1

Year Published

2008
2008
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 40 publications
(34 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
2
29
2
1
Order By: Relevance
“…[10], [14], [25], [53]). As already mentioned, large beetles remove and bury larger amounts of dung than do small beetles [54]. In our study system, species richness of large beetles was the variable that best explained the variation in the amount of dispersal for large seed mimics and the amoung of soil excavation.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 62%
“…[10], [14], [25], [53]). As already mentioned, large beetles remove and bury larger amounts of dung than do small beetles [54]. In our study system, species richness of large beetles was the variable that best explained the variation in the amount of dispersal for large seed mimics and the amoung of soil excavation.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 62%
“…Anlaş et al (2011a) reported 33 species from cow dung in a 2-year study in Manisa Province in western Anatolia of Turkey, with 12 species in common with the present study. The species counts from the present study and that of Anlaş et al (2011a), which are from very different grazing environments in Turkey, are much higher than from pastures in Hawaii (Harris et al, 1982), South Africa (Davis, 1987), Mexico (Anduaga, 2004), Australia (Edwards, 2009), and Canada (Kadiri et al, 2014), where there are normally less than 10 species. In addition, Galante et al (1991) reported 18 species (only rollers and tunnelers) from Spain and Lumaret et al (1992) reported 43 species from France.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 48%
“…However, this may be due to the fact that D. gazella is still in the initial moments of its establishment in these areas. In addition, Anduaga [37] says that despite the virtues attributed to D. gazella, this species does not fulfill its role as a mediator efficiently since it recycles excrement at a small scale due to its small size. This results in a small amount of relocated excrement and at a shallow depth, not being sufficient to control fly and parasite activity.…”
Section: New Recordsmentioning
confidence: 99%