Impact of the endoscopic teaching process on colonic adenoma detection

Lasa, Juan S.; Moore, Rafael; Peralta, Angel D.; Dima, Guillermo; Zubiaurre, Ignacio; Arguello, M.; Senderovsky, Melisa; Moretti, Luigi; Avagnina, Alejandra; Soifer, Luis

doi:10.1016/j.rgmxen.2014.06.003

Cited by 2 publications

(5 citation statements)

References 10 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…The forest plot of OR estimates and 95% CIs extracted from individual studies 22,25–28,30,32 and the results of the overall meta‐analysis are presented in Figure 2D. Fellow/trainee involvement was associated with a statistically significant higher rate of polyp detection, and the pooled OR for PDR was 1.29 (95% CI = 1.02–1.63, p = 0.020; I 2 = 89.1%).…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Seventeen articles with 18 datasets 8,9,19–33 (the study by Chalifoux et al 22 . contained two sets of data) regarding the association between fellow/trainee involvement and the detection rate of adenoma were included for meta‐analysis.…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…There were 13 studies 8,19–27,29–31 comprising 14 datasets (the study by Chalifoux et al 22 . contained two sets of data) for investigating the association between fellow involvement and the detection rate of advanced adenoma.…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Seventeen studies 8,9,[19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31][32][33] involving colonoscopy outcomes were included in this meta-analysis. These articles were published between 2009 and 2022 and included 16 observational studies, and one RCT.…”

Section: Characteristics Of Eligible Studiesmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 3 more Smart Citations

You are not lab rats at teaching hospitals: A systematic review of resident and fellow participation leads to improved colonoscopy

Sun,

Chen,

et al. 2023

J Evidence Based Medicine

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

BackgroundParticipation in colonoscopies is an essential aspect of endoscopic training. The purpose of this study was to explore the impact of fellow/trainee participation on colonoscopy outcomes.MethodsThis meta‐analysis was registered on the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO). From database inception to July 2022, studies investigating fellow involvement and colonoscopy outcomes were searched across Cochrane library, PubMed, and other databases. The random‐effects model was applied to generate more conservative estimates. Sensitive analysis was conducted to explore whether the result would depend on a particular study. Egger's test and Begg's test were used to estimate the potential for publication bias.ResultsSeventeen studies including 30,062 participants were included. We found that fellow/trainee involvement enhanced the overall rates of adenoma detection and polyp detection (OR = 1.26, 95% CI = 1.14–1.40, p < 0.001; OR = 1.29, 95% CI = 1.02–1.63, p = 0.020, respectively). The mean number of adenoma/polyps per colonoscopy was also higher with fellow/trainee participation (MD = 0.12, 95% CI = 0.08–0.17, p < 0.001; MD = 0.15, 95% CI = 0.02–0.28, p = 0.020, respectively).ConclusionIn addition to its educational purpose, fellow or trainee involvement is associated with beneficial effects on colonoscopy outcomes.

show abstract

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Characteristics Of Eligible Studiesmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 2 more Smart Citations

You are not lab rats at teaching hospitals: A systematic review of resident and fellow participation leads to improved colonoscopy

Sun,

Chen,

et al. 2023

J Evidence Based Medicine

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Randomized, controlled trials in which standard guaiac tests were administered annually or biennially have shown that cancers are detected at an earlier and more curable stage when compared with no regular screening. Over a period of 10-13 years, regular guaiac screening tests result in a reduction of colorectal cancer mortality by 15-33% [6,8,32].…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

Screening and Surveillance Colonoscopy

Ayoola¹,

Abdulla²,

Brady³

et al. 2015

Screening for Colorectal Cancer With Colonoscopy

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Colorectal cancer is a major cause of worldwide morbidity and mortality. As such, there are many guidelines and recommendations set forth by various medical societies regarding colonoscopy for screening and surveillance. The universal goal of these guidelines is to reduce colorectal cancer prevalence and mortality. Recommendations for colorectal cancer screening and surveillance using colonoscopy vary slightly between medical society guidelines and are often dictated by some combination of age, known disease severity, length of time since last study, family history, and comorbid conditions.

show abstract

Impact of the endoscopic teaching process on colonic adenoma detection

Cited by 2 publications

References 10 publications

You are not lab rats at teaching hospitals: A systematic review of resident and fellow participation leads to improved colonoscopy

You are not lab rats at teaching hospitals: A systematic review of resident and fellow participation leads to improved colonoscopy

Screening and Surveillance Colonoscopy

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About