2023
DOI: 10.1016/j.jsames.2023.104262
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Impact of the Iquique Ridge on structure and deformation of the north Chilean subduction zone

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 61 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Oceanic basement features vary in height, composition, and surface morphology and exhibit a wide variety of forms, comprising conical shapes (peaked or flat‐top), multiple branches, or parallel ridges (Figures 1b and 1c). Seamounts, which represent one of the most common and most widespread topographic features on oceanic plates, have been documented within numerous subduction zone systems, including Tonga‐Kermadec (Timm et al., 2013), Nankai (Bangs et al., 2006), Japan and Kuril (Lallemand et al., 1989), Cascadia (Tréhu et al., 2012), Hikurangi (Bell et al., 2014), northern Chile (Ma et al., 2023), and Central America (Ranero & Von Huene, 2000). Upper plate deformation associated with seamount subduction is manifested by re‐entrants or scarps at the margin toe (Ranero & Von Huene, 2000), gravitational submarine landslides (Brune et al., 2010), strike‐slip faulting (Davidson et al., 2020), regional uplift (Laursen et al., 2002) or the landward shift of the deformation front (Kopp et al., 2006).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Oceanic basement features vary in height, composition, and surface morphology and exhibit a wide variety of forms, comprising conical shapes (peaked or flat‐top), multiple branches, or parallel ridges (Figures 1b and 1c). Seamounts, which represent one of the most common and most widespread topographic features on oceanic plates, have been documented within numerous subduction zone systems, including Tonga‐Kermadec (Timm et al., 2013), Nankai (Bangs et al., 2006), Japan and Kuril (Lallemand et al., 1989), Cascadia (Tréhu et al., 2012), Hikurangi (Bell et al., 2014), northern Chile (Ma et al., 2023), and Central America (Ranero & Von Huene, 2000). Upper plate deformation associated with seamount subduction is manifested by re‐entrants or scarps at the margin toe (Ranero & Von Huene, 2000), gravitational submarine landslides (Brune et al., 2010), strike‐slip faulting (Davidson et al., 2020), regional uplift (Laursen et al., 2002) or the landward shift of the deformation front (Kopp et al., 2006).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…By correlating gravity anomalies with bathymetry, studies have demonstrated the frictional control of individual geologic features on the spatial variation of seismogenic behaviour at subduction zones (Bürgmann et al, 2005;Song & Simons, 2003). Commonly observed features causing perturbations in the stress field at the plate interface include aseismic ridges (e.g., Ma et al, 2023), fracture zones (e.g., Kasahara et al, 1997), and seamounts (e.g., Bonnet et al, 2019). The relationship between roughness and seismicity has been well demonstrated at the southern America subduction zone where the spatial pattern of many large subduction earthquakes mimics the distribution of topographic highs which serve to segment the plate boundary (Bilek, 2010;Metois et al, 2016).…”
Section: Subducting Sediment Thickness and Roughnessmentioning
confidence: 99%