2008
DOI: 10.1103/physreva.77.063408
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Impact of the Meissner effect on magnetic microtraps for neutral atoms near superconducting thin films

Abstract: We theoretically evaluate changes in the magnetic potential arising from the magnetic field near superconducting thin films. An example of an atom chip based on a three-wire configuration has been simulated in the superconducting and the normal conducting state. Inhomogeneous current densities within the superconducting wires were calculated using an energy-minimization routine based on the London theory. The Meissner effect causes changes to both trap position and oscillation frequencies at short distances fr… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
16
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
1
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For example it is well known that a superconducting material has the ability to generate permanent currents in order to screen an applied magnetic field (Meissner effect). Evidence of this phenomenon has been recently observed with the ENS setup: permanent currents in the superconducting film strongly distort the trapping potential seen by the atoms as in [13]. In the experiment of [13] atoms are trapped close to a relatively large cylindrical su-perconducting wire which is well described by the Meissner state.…”
Section: Probing the Superconducting Film Current Distributionmentioning
confidence: 80%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For example it is well known that a superconducting material has the ability to generate permanent currents in order to screen an applied magnetic field (Meissner effect). Evidence of this phenomenon has been recently observed with the ENS setup: permanent currents in the superconducting film strongly distort the trapping potential seen by the atoms as in [13]. In the experiment of [13] atoms are trapped close to a relatively large cylindrical su-perconducting wire which is well described by the Meissner state.…”
Section: Probing the Superconducting Film Current Distributionmentioning
confidence: 80%
“…In the case of an atom chip, those currents are likely to affect the trapping potential [13] and reduce its depth when the atoms are brought very close to the surface. The properties of such a surface are dramatically different from those of a normal metal.…”
Section: Probing the Superconducting Film Current Distributionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nonetheless, this limitation of the actual microtrap configuration, which is caused by the exclusion of the magnetic flux from the niobium wire, can be overcome by using superconducting thin films [16] or superconducting microstructures with antidots [17]. These allow the penetration of magnetic flux and promise to support strong magnetic confinement for atom clouds with exceptional spin coherence times even at micron distances from the superconducting surface.…”
Section: Exceptionally Long Atomic Spin Coherence Near Superconductorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Magnetic traps on superconductors in the Meissner state have been realized in several experiments (see, e.g., [ 7,[14][15][16]). In [ 9,[17][18][19] the magnetic field for such traps was estimated using the sheet current density in an infinite strip in the Meissner state. For thin films of an arbitrary shape, the distribution of the Meissner current can be found numerically, solving the London equations by a finite element method [20][21][22].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%