Objectives
Aged patients are often characterized by difficult blood sampling conditions. Smaller needle gauge (G) may be beneficial for venous access and reduced pain perception, however, potentially at the expense of lower blood quality for laboratory measurements. We systematically compared two blood collection sets with different outer but equal inner diameters; different needle tips, and retract mechanisms in aged patients (Safety-Lok™, 23G, SL vs. UltraTouch™ Push Button, 25G, UT-PB) regarding clinical aspects and laboratory measurements.
Methods
Clinical examination and questionnaires were used in an aged cohort (n=161, average age=81.6 years), to determine characteristics of venipuncture, the phlebotomist’s assessment of blood draw including level of difficulty, and patient’s pain perception with either one or both blood collection sets. Sample quality was evaluated by laboratory analytics considering 13 parameters.
Results
SL, UT-PB, or both were used in 89 (55 %), 72 (45 %) or 36 (22 %) patients. The handling of the blood collection sets was perceived slightly easier for UT-PB compared to SL by the phlebotomist (−30 %, p=0.038). There was no significant difference in other parameters of the phlebotomist’s assessment or patients’ perception of blood collection. There was no clinically relevant difference between both sets in any of the laboratory measurements, including potassium and hemolysis index.
Conclusions
Clinical use of the UT-PB compared with SL in aged patients was associated with slight advantages of UT-PB, e.g. in the handling comfort for the phlebotomist. Sample quality, especially regarding hemolysis, was identical between both blood collecting sets, making its use uncritical in difficult venous conditions commonly seen in elderly patients.