Impact of the observers' experience on daily prostate localization accuracy in ultrasound‐based IGRT with the Clarity platform

Abstract

The aim of this study is to evaluate the accuracy of daily prostate localization with ultrasound imaging of various radiation oncologists with nonhomogeneous expertise. For ten patients who underwent radical radiotherapy for localized prostate cancer, 11 radiation oncologists reviewed daily ultrasound scans acquired during three different treatment sessions. The average values of two senior radiation oncologists, considered to be expert observers, were selected as reference. The remaining nine observers were divided into two groups, Group 1 and Group 2, with more and less than one year of experience, respectively. The recorded shifts in prostate position were divided in three classes: <3 mm, 3–5 mm, and > 5 mm. Deviations from reference were less than 3 mm in all directions in 91% and 81% of measurements in Groups 1 and 2, respectively. The maximum difference in terms of root mean square error (RMSE) was reported for superior‐inferior (SI) direction, in particular a mean difference of 3.24 mm was observed for Group 2 in respect to the reference; moreover RMSE was 1 and 1.3 mm higher for Group 2 for anterior‐posterior (AP) and left‐right (LR) directions, respectively. The difference between Groups 1 and 2 was significant (p < 0.01) for all directions. The mean values for the shifts in all three directions between Group 1 and the references were 0.235 mm, 0.385 mm, and 0.009 mm for the LR, SI, and AP directions, respectively. The position of the prostate gland is more easily detectable (p.15em=.15em0.02) in the AP direction, while the visibility is lower for LR (p.15em=.15em0.02) and SI boundaries (p < 0.05). The observers' experience is essential for positioning the target correctly; therefore, a training period is recommended before putting the system into clinical practice.PACS number: 87.63.dh

The Use of Ultrasound Imaging in the External Beam Radiotherapy Workflow of Prostate Cancer Patients

“…The results reported by Fiandra et al [ 32 ] show that the interuser variability decreases with growing TAUS imaging experience. The same holds for the intrauser variability during TPUS imaging, as reported by Pang et al [ 33 ].…”

Three-Dimensional Ultrasound-Based Image-Guided Hypofractionated Radiotherapy for Intermediate-Risk Prostate Cancer: Results of a Consecutive Case Series

“…Subsequently, the treatment PRV is at first automatically aligned with the reference PRV using an optimization algorithm based on gray values and thereafter manually by the operator. Whenever the alignment is considered ideal, the system automatically takes into account for final target displacements with a couch translation alongside anterior-posterior, cranio-caudal and latero-lateral directions (13). The whole procedure takes only a few minutes in an appropriately trained environment, with comparable timeframes to CBCT-based approaches.…”

Surface refraction of sound waves affects calibration of three-dimensional ultrasound

“…to improve soft tissue contrast for better target and organ at risk delineation) and during treatment (for non-invasive dose-free patient positioning control, and monitoring of inter- and intra-fraction organ movements). The accuracy of the technique depends not only on the achievable image quality in clinical routine [ 10 ], but also on technical limitations of achievable precision during calibration [ 11 ].…”