Impact of the removal of filling material from the post space with ultrasonic insert and magnification with a surgical microscope on the bond strength and adhesive interface of multifilament fiberglass posts onto flat-oval root canals

Bertolini, Gunther Ricardo; Santos, Guilherme Nilson Alves dos; Paula, Francisco Wanderley Garcia de; Silva‐Sousa, Alice Corrêa; Roperto, Renato; Sousa‐Neto, Manoel Damião; Lopes, Fabiane Carneiro

doi:10.1016/j.jmbbm.2022.105264

Cited by 9 publications

(22 citation statements)

References 25 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…They have shown increasing resistance to root fracture and a highly relevant success factor for the longevity of future restoration of endodontically treated teeth. 33,34 Post-space cleaning must be implemented regardless of the endodontic sealer used for canal obturation. 35 To ensure that the presence of the smear layer did not have positive or negative effects after post-space preparation, 17% EDTA and 5.25% NaOC1 irrigation solutions, respectively, were used to remove it.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Effect of Endodontic Bioceramic Sealer versus Resin Based Sealer in The Bond Strength of Fiber Posts Luted with Resin Cement to Root Dentin (An In-Vitro Study)

Sabry,

Beleidy,

Shaker

2023

Egyptian Dental Journal

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Purpose: To evaluate Well-Root ST and Expoxidin Duo sealers' contact angle, dentinal tubule penetration, and their impact on fiber post-bond strength. Materials and Methods:Fifty-eight maxillary central incisor teeth were collected and decoronated. Ten teeth were longitudinally split into 20 segments and treated with bioceramic (Well-Root ST) and epoxy resin-based (Epoxidin Duo) sealers (n=10 per group) to evaluate the contact angle. Forty-eight teeth were divided into two groups (n=24) based on the same sealers used for obturation. Both obturated teeth groups were subdivided into two subgroups based on the evaluating test; 14 specimens were assessed for dentinal tubule penetration using a scanning electron microscope (SEM), and 10 specimens were restored with fiber posts and cross-sectioned to evaluate the push-out bond strength using a universal testing machine. Failure mode was determined for pushed-out slices under a SEM. Independent t-test was used to compare two different groups. One-Way ANOVA and Tukey's Post Hoc tests were used for multiple comparisons. P < 0.05 was the significance level.Results: Epoxidin Duo group showed a significantly higher contact angle (56.78 ± 0.68 o ) than Well-Root ST group (53.25 ± 0.25 o ). Well-Root ST group showed significantly higher dentinal tubule penetration (10.40 ± 1.05 µm) than Epoxidin Duo group (7.61 ± 1.08 µm). Both groups showed a non-significant push-out bond strength difference. Conclusions: Bioceramic sealer showed higher wettability and dentinal tubule penetration than epoxy resin-based sealer. However, both sealers affected the fiber post-bond strength at various regions throughout the root canal length without influencing the total bond strength.

show abstract

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Effect of Endodontic Bioceramic Sealer versus Resin Based Sealer in The Bond Strength of Fiber Posts Luted with Resin Cement to Root Dentin (An In-Vitro Study)

Sabry,

Beleidy,

Shaker

2023

Egyptian Dental Journal

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…This study was approved by the Research Ethics Committee of the Ribeirão Preto School of Dentistry, University of São Paulo (CAAE: 61010022.8.0000.5419). The sample calculation was made by using the SigmaPlot v.12.00 program (Systat Software, San Jose, CA) based on parameters from previous studies [31][32][33][34]. A probability level of α = 0.05 and a statistical power of 0.9 were considered, with an estimated minimum number of 10 specimens for each group for bond strength tests, failure pattern and analysis of the adhesive interface.…”

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Influence of bioceramic cones on the quality of root canal filling relative to bond strength and adaptation of the adhesive interface

Quaresma

Santos

Silva‐Sousa

et al. 2023

Preprint

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Aim To evaluate the bond strength (BS) and analysis of the adhesive interface in root canals filled with bioceramic gutta percha sealers and cones. Material and Methods Ninety-six maxillary canines were divided into eight groups according to the endodontic sealer (AH Plus, AH Plus Bioceramic, Bio-C Sealer or Bio-C Sealer Ion + and gutta percha cones (conventional or bioceramic) tested. They were analyzed using the BS test, failure pattern, analysis of the adhesive interface by scanning electron microscopy and confocal laser scanning microscopy. The BS data were compared between groups using the analysis of variance test with the Turkey post-test. The chi-square test was used to assess the type of failure and the non-parametric Mann-Whitney and Kruse-Wallis tests (p < 0.05). Results Analysis of variance showed higher BS values for the groups of bioceramic gutta percha cones in Bio-C Sealer Ion+ (8.38 ± 4.27), AH Plus Bioceramic (6.19 ± 3.28), Bio-C Sealer (5.70 ± 3.18), AH Plus (4.61 ± 2.11) and for conventional gutta percha cones in AH Plus sealers (4.26 ± 2.35), Bio-C Sealer Ion+ (3.63 ± 2.29), Bio-C Sealer (2.94 ± 2.32) and AH Plus Bioceramic (1.19 ± 0.89) (p < 0.05). Relative to the type of failure and adaptation of the types of filling material, a higher percentage of mixed failures was observed (gaps between 1 µm-10 µm) for the group with bioceramic gutta percha cones (p < 0.001). Conclusion The bond between sealers and bioceramic gutta percha cones showed higher bond strength values and greater penetration into the dentin tubules. Clinical Relevance: The filling the root canal system with bioceramic sealers should be associated with bioceramic gutta percha cones.

show abstract

“…Endodontic treated teeth are often restored with intraradicular posts due to excessive loss of coronal structure caused by caries, previous restorations, or fractures [1][2][3] . The retention of fiberglass posts inside the root canal depends on their characteristics such as length, diameter, and type of surface (serrated cylindrical, smooth cylindrical, conical, and double conic), as well as the type of cementing material 1,4,5) , technique used to insert the cementing material into the root canal 5,6) , and integrity of the adhesive interface 3,[7][8][9][10][11][12] .…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…The literature has demonstrated the maladaptation at the adhesive interface between the post, resin cement and root dentin of restorations performed with fiberglass posts in endodontically treated teeth 3,[9][10][11]25,26) . This has been found especially in root canals with oval or flattened cross-section 10,11,25,26) since the lack of compatibility between the diameter of the root canal, and the fiberglass posts leads to the formation of a thicker film of resin cement around the posts 25,27) thus compromising their adaptation to the dentin walls and BS [26][27][28] .…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Evaluation of the push-out bond strength of an adjustable fiberglass post system to an endodontically treated oval root canal

et al. 2023

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

To evaluate the push-out bond strength of the adjustable fiberglass post system to dentin. Twenty maxillary canine roots were endodontically treated and divided into two groups (n=10): conventional fiberglass posts (CFPs) and with single adjustable post (SAP) system. Two slices of each third were subjected to the push-out and failure pattern test and the most apical slice was subjected to analysis of the adhesive interface by scanning electron microscopy (SEM). Data were analyzed by the three-way analysis of variance, Tukey, and Friedman tests, and linear regression (α=0.05). The results showed higher push-out bond strength in the initial time interval for SAP (10.3±5.3, p<0.01). After 6 months, there was reduction in push-out bond strength for both (p<0.001). A higher percentage of adhesive and cohesive failures to dentin. After 6 months areas of maladaptation were noted (p=0.000). The SAP is completed to the promissory root canal in relation to alternative CFP.

show abstract

Impact of the removal of filling material from the post space with ultrasonic insert and magnification with a surgical microscope on the bond strength and adhesive interface of multifilament fiberglass posts onto flat-oval root canals

Cited by 9 publications

References 25 publications

Effect of Endodontic Bioceramic Sealer versus Resin Based Sealer in The Bond Strength of Fiber Posts Luted with Resin Cement to Root Dentin (An In-Vitro Study)

Effect of Endodontic Bioceramic Sealer versus Resin Based Sealer in The Bond Strength of Fiber Posts Luted with Resin Cement to Root Dentin (An In-Vitro Study)

Influence of bioceramic cones on the quality of root canal filling relative to bond strength and adaptation of the adhesive interface

Evaluation of the push-out bond strength of an adjustable fiberglass post system to an endodontically treated oval root canal

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About