2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2015.07.071
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Impact of the resolution of brain parcels on connectome-wide association studies in fMRI

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
40
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

5
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 50 publications
(43 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
3
40
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Besides, we applied the FDR control to each contrast separately. In the presence of true discoveries that are strong and widespread, it has been argued 32 and supported based on simulations 30 that the FDR scales well across contrasts, as it controls for a proportion, even in the presence of positive dependencies across contrasts (as in the repeated-measures scenario explored here).…”
Section: Connectome-wide Association Analysismentioning
confidence: 58%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Besides, we applied the FDR control to each contrast separately. In the presence of true discoveries that are strong and widespread, it has been argued 32 and supported based on simulations 30 that the FDR scales well across contrasts, as it controls for a proportion, even in the presence of positive dependencies across contrasts (as in the repeated-measures scenario explored here).…”
Section: Connectome-wide Association Analysismentioning
confidence: 58%
“…We carried out the cluster procedure at a specific resolution, with 50 clusters, as this resolution has been suggested to have higher sensitivity for connectome-wide association analyses in our prior independent work using the same methodology. 30 These functional brain clusters, hereafter coined as regions, were generated using the concatenation of the 3 fMRI runs, thus encompassing all cognitive contexts as well as short rest epochs.…”
Section: Functional Brain Parcellationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In particular, we performed three types of contrast statistics: (1) all coordinates irrespective of seed network; and given the focus on the default mode network (DMN) in the literature, (2) coordinates associated with seeds inside the DMN only; and (3) coordinates associated with seeds outside the DMN, that is, non-DMN seeds. All analyses were conducted using a multiresolution atlas of group-level functional brain parcellations derived from an independent rsfMRI data set, the Bootstrap Analysis of Stable Clusters–Cambridge atlas (https://dx.doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.1285615.v1) [15]. This atlas consists of nine functional parcellations capturing successively finer levels of spatial detail, of which we used parcellations at two resolutions: the first comprised seven commonly used large-scale networks (R7 atlas) and the second containing 36 networks (R36 atlas).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…All analyses were conducted using a multiresolution atlas of group-level functional brain parcellations derived from an independent rsfMRI data set, the Bootstrap Analysis of Stable ClustersCambridge atlas (https://dx.doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare. 1285615.v1) [15]. This atlas consists of nine functional parcellations capturing successively finer levels of spatial detail, of which we used parcellations at two resolutions: the first comprised seven commonly used large-scale networks (R7 atlas) and the second containing 36 networks (R36 atlas).…”
Section: Network-based Statisticsmentioning
confidence: 99%