2001
DOI: 10.1111/j.1469-8749.2001.tb00727.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Impact of the therapist‐child dyad on children's pain and coping during medical procedures

Abstract: This study examined the effects of physical therapists' behaviors on the levels of distress and coping of 32 children (19 males, 11 females; age range 2.6 to 9.1 years) during a painful medical procedure. This is the second study to assess children throughout rehabilitation following selective posterior rhizotomy and the first to assess the impact of physical therapists’behaviors. Results of the Child‐Adult Medical Procedure Interaction Scale‐Revised confirmed the hypotheses that: (1) children exhibit more cop… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
12
0
1

Year Published

2005
2005
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
1
12
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The descriptions of the coded nonverbal behaviors were derived from the nonverbal behavior codes defined in the CAMPIS-SF. 22,30,39,40 Our coding procedure comprised the following codes for parents' behavior: (1) verbal/nonverbal pain-attending behavior, (2) verbal/nonverbal nonpain-attending behavior, and (3) other. The nonverbal behavior categories used in our coding scheme (ie, painattending vs. nonpain-attending) were made in accordance with the verbal behavior categories used by Walker and colleagues 26 (attending talk vs. distracting talk) and the CAMPIS-R (distress-promoting vs. coping-promoting behavior).…”
Section: Parental and Child Behaviormentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The descriptions of the coded nonverbal behaviors were derived from the nonverbal behavior codes defined in the CAMPIS-SF. 22,30,39,40 Our coding procedure comprised the following codes for parents' behavior: (1) verbal/nonverbal pain-attending behavior, (2) verbal/nonverbal nonpain-attending behavior, and (3) other. The nonverbal behavior categories used in our coding scheme (ie, painattending vs. nonpain-attending) were made in accordance with the verbal behavior categories used by Walker and colleagues 26 (attending talk vs. distracting talk) and the CAMPIS-R (distress-promoting vs. coping-promoting behavior).…”
Section: Parental and Child Behaviormentioning
confidence: 99%
“…7 Standardized pain assessment tools were classified into self-report, physiological, behavioral, and composite measures. 14,29 The survey was formatted on Survey Monkey. 22 A list of nonpharmaceutical pain management techniques that may be used by physical therapists was developed on the basis of several Cochrane reviews of nonpharmaceutical pain management in children with a variety of diagnoses, 1 study on the effects of the psychosocial physical therapy environment on child coping, and reviews of pain and anxiety management in children undergoing medical procedures.…”
Section: Survey Developmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The ability of children to cope with pain induced by therapy procedures appears to be related to their cognitive status; 42 children with CP with the greatest potential for development of deformity are likely to be those least well able to cope with pain related to the use of a postural management programme and least able to communicate their resultant distress. This distress and pain may increase the child’s muscle tone 43 leading to further pain and spasm which may be relieved only by removing the postural management system.…”
Section: Body Structure and Functionmentioning
confidence: 99%