2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2015.08.044
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Impact of treated wastewater on organismic biosensors at various levels of biological organization

Abstract: Relating the treated wastewater quality and its impact on organismic biosensors (Prussian carp, Carassius gibelio and earthworm, Eisenia fetida) was the main objective of the study. The impact on health status of fish living downstream, microbiological contamination and antimicrobial resistance, fish tissue structure, blood biochemistry, oxidative stress, genotoxic effects, as well as multixenobiotic resistance mechanism (MXR) was assessed. Treated wastewater discharged from the WWTP modified the environmental… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

4
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 53 publications
0
4
1
Order By: Relevance
“…From skin, fecal coliforms, E.coli, P. aeruginosa and sulphitereducing clostridia were not isolated, nor from any of the internal organs. Although fecal indicator bacteria were not retrieved in large numbers in downstream fish, and fecal coliforms and intestinal enterococci in this study were not significantly elevated in water bodies from which fish were captured (Topić Popović et al, 2015a), there is a risk of pathogens penetrating fish tissues. It rises if the total counts of heterotrophic aerobic bacteria exceed 10 4 CFU mL -1 of such water, and usually only fecal contamination indicators are used for such estimations (Molleda et al, 2008;Harnisz and Tucholski, 2010).…”
Section: Resultscontrasting
confidence: 60%
“…From skin, fecal coliforms, E.coli, P. aeruginosa and sulphitereducing clostridia were not isolated, nor from any of the internal organs. Although fecal indicator bacteria were not retrieved in large numbers in downstream fish, and fecal coliforms and intestinal enterococci in this study were not significantly elevated in water bodies from which fish were captured (Topić Popović et al, 2015a), there is a risk of pathogens penetrating fish tissues. It rises if the total counts of heterotrophic aerobic bacteria exceed 10 4 CFU mL -1 of such water, and usually only fecal contamination indicators are used for such estimations (Molleda et al, 2008;Harnisz and Tucholski, 2010).…”
Section: Resultscontrasting
confidence: 60%
“…Discharges from WWTPs directly and indirectly affect both terrestrial and aquatic ecosystems (Babić et al, 2016). Treated wastewater discharged from the WWTP in this work modified the environmental parameters and xenobiotic concentrations of the receiving surface waters, while potential bacterial pathogens from fish and respective waters were observed in relatively low numbers, as described previously in Topić Popović et al (2015). S. baltica was retrieved from the gills, liver, and kidney of fish living in WWTP-affected waters, having none to slight clinical signs.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 57%
“…Food waste in water represents a unique field compared to solid waste; and biosensing, nanomaterials, and wireless communication have been introduced in this field to enhance the accuracy, power consumption efficiency, data storage capabilities, communication ability, remote sensing, and commercialization [ 108 ]. Biosensing technologies can be applied to test-treated waste water released from local waste water treatment plant, because it is important to monitor the treated waste water to prevent harmful effects and reduce adverse influences on the local environment and organisms living in water, such as fish and other species [ 109 ]. Future challenges in water waste biosensing processes exist in establishing multitude of sensing arrays with multi-location deployable, unique sensing properties, and better sensing accuracy; developing wireless networks to improve remote sensing qualities, and improving cost-benefit ratios in emerging waste processing sectors.…”
Section: Biosensing In Food Waste Processing and Environmentmentioning
confidence: 99%