2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.rvsc.2016.06.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Impact of two different colistin dosing strategies on healthy piglet fecal microbiota

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
21
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
4
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…parameters subsequent to CS use in the post-weaning period in pigs [78,79]. In order to evaluate the effect of colistin on fecal E. coli shedding, bacterial quantification was performed in most studies using culture methods [28,77], whereas other studies used real-time PCR [79,80]. Furthermore, the oral use of a high dose of colistin in healthy piglets was not associated with a major perturbation in the pig gut microbiota as demonstrated by a high-throughput sequencing method [80].…”
Section: Microbiological and Clinical Outcomes Of Colistin Use In Conmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…parameters subsequent to CS use in the post-weaning period in pigs [78,79]. In order to evaluate the effect of colistin on fecal E. coli shedding, bacterial quantification was performed in most studies using culture methods [28,77], whereas other studies used real-time PCR [79,80]. Furthermore, the oral use of a high dose of colistin in healthy piglets was not associated with a major perturbation in the pig gut microbiota as demonstrated by a high-throughput sequencing method [80].…”
Section: Microbiological and Clinical Outcomes Of Colistin Use In Conmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this study, no difference was observed between the CS treated and the control group in terms of average daily gain per day (ADG/day), Fleury M etl., 2016 [5]. Also, the economic benefits of antimicrobial growth promotion in modern farms have been questioned [6,12,13], the benefit of this use being associated with poor hygiene on farms.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The following primer sequences were used in targeting the 16S rRNA gene of bacteria: for E. coli , 5′‐CATGCCGCGTGTATGAAGAA‐3′ and 5′‐CGGGTAACGTCAATGAGCAAA‐3′, Probe: (6FAM)TATTAACTTTACTCCCTTCCTCCCCGCTGA(BHQ1); for Lactobacillus spp., 5′‐AGCAGTAGGGAATCT TCCA‐3′ and 5′‐CGCCACTGGTGTTCYTCCATATA‐3′; for Clostridium leptum subgroup, 5′‐GCACAAGCAGTGGAGT‐3′ and 5′‐CTTCCTCCGTTTTGTCAA‐3′; and for Clostridium coccoides , 5′‐CGGTACCTGACTAAGAAGC‐3′ and 5′‐AGTTTTATTCTTGCGAACG‐3′ (Fleury et al, ; Kong et al, ). Duplicate sample analyses were performed in mixtures (final volume, 10 μl) that contained 1 μl of diluted DNA sample and 0.2 μM of each primer, using a 1 × of SYBR ® Premix Ex Taq™ II Kit (TaKaRa Bio Inc., Shiga, Japan).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The following primer sequences were used in targeting the 16S rRNA gene of bacteria: for E. coli, 5′-CATGCCGCGTGTATGAAGAA-3′ and 5′-CGGGTAACGTCAATGAGCAAA-3′, Probe: (6FAM)TATTAAC TTTACTCCCTTCCTCCCCGCTGA(BHQ1); for Lactobacillus spp., 5′-AGCAGTAGGGAATCT TCCA-3′ and 5′-CGCCACTGGTGTTCYTCCA TATA-3′; for Clostridium leptum subgroup, 5′-GCACAAGCAGTGG AGT-3′ and 5′-CTTCCTCCGTTTTGTCAA-3′; and for Clostridium coccoides, 5′-CGGTACCTGACTAAGAAGC-3′ and 5′-AGTTTTATTCT TGCGAACG-3′ (Fleury et al, 2016;Kong et al, 2014)…”
Section: Bacterial Quantification By Real-time Pcrmentioning
confidence: 99%