2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.127948
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Impact of ultrasonic pretreatment on Fenton-based oxidation of olive mill wastewater - towards a sustainable treatment scheme

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It fulfills the requirements of “green chemistry” [7] . Research on combining it with other AOPs or biological treatments to reduce the cost has been conducted [8] , [9] , [10] . However, most of the laboratory experiments on sonodegradation were performed in pure water, which neglected the fact that the sonochemical process could be affected by the suspended solids in wastewater, including sand grains and microplastics [11] .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It fulfills the requirements of “green chemistry” [7] . Research on combining it with other AOPs or biological treatments to reduce the cost has been conducted [8] , [9] , [10] . However, most of the laboratory experiments on sonodegradation were performed in pure water, which neglected the fact that the sonochemical process could be affected by the suspended solids in wastewater, including sand grains and microplastics [11] .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, nZVI self-production of H 2 O 2 and higher Fe 2 + concentration in solution directly accelerated COD removal from palm oil mill effluent (POME) by Fenton method. Ciggin et al [59] on the other hand, evaluated the potential of ultrasound-enhanced advanced oxidation in reducing the toxicity and organic content of olive mill wastewaters (OMWs). The highlight was the effective toxicity reduction achieved by Fenton oxidation, which was assessed by respirometry, where the individual removal efficiencies of the ultrasonic and advanced oxidation processes were evaluated separately and sequentially.…”
Section: Sf (1))mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The fit of the model for the responses is determined by the coefficient of determination (R 2 ) and the coefficient of variation (C.V) values; the value of R 2 must be greater than 0.8 to indicate a good model for the data [62]. The C.V is the standard deviation-tomean ratio, expressed as a percentage (%); C.V less than 10% indicates that the model is reproducible [63][64][65]. In this study, all the responses had an R 2 greater than 0.90; as shown in Table 5, the R 2 for O&G and COD was 98.38% and 95.58%, respectively.…”
Section: Statistical Analysis By Rsmmentioning
confidence: 99%