Impact of ultrasound diagnosis for chronic pelvic pain

Abstract

Background:This study aims to assess the impact of ultrasound diagnosis in patients with chronic pelvic pain (CPP).Methods:We will carry out a comprehensive electronic search from the databases below: PUBMED, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, PSYCINFO, Web of Science, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature, Allied and Complementary Medicine Database, Chinese Biomedical Literature Database, China National Knowledge Infrastructure, and WANGFANG databases from inception to July 1, 2019. The case-controlled studies focusing on impact of ultrasound diagnosis for patients CPP will be included in this study. Two authors will independently conduct all study selection, data collection, and risk of bias assessment. The risk of bias assessment will be assessed using Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies tool. We will apply RevMan V.5.3 software and Stata V.12.0 software for data pooling and statistical analysis.Results:This study will present pooled effect estimates regarding the impact of ultrasound diagnosis for CPP by assessing sensitivity, specificity, positive likelihood ratio, negative likelihood ratio, and diagnostic odds ratio of ultrasound to determine the diagnostic accuracy of ultrasound diagnosis for CPP.Conclusion:This study will provide modest evidence for the diagnostic accuracy of ultrasound in patients with CPP.Systematic review registration:PROSPERO CRD42019142799.

A Delphi Consensus-Based Chronic Pelvic Pain Standardized Ultrasound Approach

“…A recent systematic review showed modest evidence of the diagnostic accuracy of ultrasound in patients with CPP [16], despite the recommendations as a first-line test in the evaluation of the female pelvices [18,19]. At least in part, this may be due to the absence of consensual protocols for obtaining images and reports, which prevents a more precise conclusion about the usefulness or real limitation of the method in this population.…”