2012
DOI: 10.2113/gselements.8.6.429
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Impact of Urban Development on Physical and Chemical Hydrogeology

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0
2

Year Published

2013
2013
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
13
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…This is because methods developed in relatively undisturbed experimental sites may not translate to perturbed urban environments [Buttle et al, 1995], and tracer signals from urban runoff may be confounded by other anthropogenic influences such as leaking supply and sewer pipes and water imports. Where isotopic tracers have been used in urban hydrology, they have enabled differentiation of water sources (e.g., mains supply, road runoff, sewage effluent, and natural recharge) and identification of their influence on urban streams and groundwater bodies [Harris et al, 1999;Gremillion et al, 2000;Wilcox et al, 2004;Wong et al, 2012]. However, the application of transit time models to catchments with contrasting urbanization levels by Burns et al [2005] was unable to differentiate stream water age.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is because methods developed in relatively undisturbed experimental sites may not translate to perturbed urban environments [Buttle et al, 1995], and tracer signals from urban runoff may be confounded by other anthropogenic influences such as leaking supply and sewer pipes and water imports. Where isotopic tracers have been used in urban hydrology, they have enabled differentiation of water sources (e.g., mains supply, road runoff, sewage effluent, and natural recharge) and identification of their influence on urban streams and groundwater bodies [Harris et al, 1999;Gremillion et al, 2000;Wilcox et al, 2004;Wong et al, 2012]. However, the application of transit time models to catchments with contrasting urbanization levels by Burns et al [2005] was unable to differentiate stream water age.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As expected most of the major parameters in the urban streams water, even when comparing their minimum values, exceed the median values of mainland stream water. Profound differences exist for EC, Na + , SO4 2-and Cl -, indicative of urban impact on water quality (Wong et al 2012). Atmospheric deposition and storm-water runoff in urban environments contains a variety of leached constituents including H2SO4, HNO3, organic matter, trace metals and industrial compounds.…”
Section: Major Parameters Of Water Chemistrymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Microbial contamination due to wastewater is a very common threat in urban environments while contamination by metals and industrial compounds is a long-term concern in industrialized cities (Wong et al 2012). In this study the geochemistry of water samples and stream sediment samples, from all three streams, has been analysed and compared over a period of one year.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In a 'Special Issue' of the Magazine ELEMENTS (on Urban Geochemistry), Wong et al (2012) noted that '' . .…”
Section: Urban Hydrographic Networkmentioning
confidence: 99%