2011
DOI: 10.1017/s1368980011001285
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Impact of using nationalv. international definitions of underweight, overweight and obesity: an example from Kuwait

Abstract: Caution should be exercised when using recently collected national reference data and definitions while assessing underweight, overweight and obesity for clinical and public health applications.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
18
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
0
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To our knowledge, no other study has compared the Fitnessgram or IOTF standards with the Hungarian national BMI standards, but some other comparisons using countryspecific BMI standards have shown similar disparities. For example, in a sample of Kuwaiti 10-to 14-year-olds, the Fitnessgram and IOTF criteria identified 44.9% and 44.7% of children as overweight/obese, respectively, while using Kuwaiti national reference standards resulted in that percentage dropping to 36.7% (El-Ghaziri, Boodai, Young, & Reilly, 2011). In contrast, in a 2011 study of U.S. and English 12-to 17-year-olds, using national standards from the United Kingdom resulted in the prevalence of overweight/obesity being 7% to 9% higher than estimates using Fitnessgram or IOTF standards (Lang et al, 2011).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To our knowledge, no other study has compared the Fitnessgram or IOTF standards with the Hungarian national BMI standards, but some other comparisons using countryspecific BMI standards have shown similar disparities. For example, in a sample of Kuwaiti 10-to 14-year-olds, the Fitnessgram and IOTF criteria identified 44.9% and 44.7% of children as overweight/obese, respectively, while using Kuwaiti national reference standards resulted in that percentage dropping to 36.7% (El-Ghaziri, Boodai, Young, & Reilly, 2011). In contrast, in a 2011 study of U.S. and English 12-to 17-year-olds, using national standards from the United Kingdom resulted in the prevalence of overweight/obesity being 7% to 9% higher than estimates using Fitnessgram or IOTF standards (Lang et al, 2011).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Three-quarters (75.6%) of Kuwaiti females and 70.1% of males were overweight (BMI ≥ 25.0 kg/m 2 ) or obese (BMI ≥ 30.0 kg/m 2 ). Obesity (both overall and abdominal) has been found to be a significant public health problem in Kuwait previously [4,6,31] and seems to be increasing [3,9] among all segments of the Kuwaiti population, especially among females, where 55% are obese [3,9,10,11] and the problem seems to start in childhood and adolescence [8]. …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The major difference between these definitions is the cut-points used for waist circumference. Currently, Kuwait has not yet developed accepted waist circumference or BMI cut-points for adults [31]. …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Obesity was defined as BMI ≥ 95 th centile, overweight as BMI of ≥ 85 th centile and <95 th centile, healthy weight was defined as BMI ≥ 3 rd centile and < 85 th centile. The US BMI reference data were used in the present study because the absolute BMI values at standard Kuwaiti centiles are extremely high [20], as the Kuwaiti BMI reference was constructed after the obesity epidemic had affected Kuwait [21]. The total number of pupils who did not fulfill the inclusion criteria and/or did not consent was 542, 224 males and 318 females, leaving 500 eligible consenting participants, 318 boys and 182 girls.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%