2011
DOI: 10.1103/physrevlett.106.196403
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Impact of Valley Polarization on the Resistivity in Two Dimensions

Abstract: We examine the temperature dependence of resistivity in a two-dimensional electron system formed in a silicon-on-insulator quantum well. The device allows us to tune the valley splitting continuously in addition to the electron density. Our data provide a global picture of how the resistivity and its temperature dependence change with valley polarization. At the boundary between valley-polarized and partially polarized regions, we demonstrate that there is an insulating contribution from spin-degenerate electr… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

3
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Unlike most materials used for qubits, silicon posses a complex momentum space structure, primarily arising due to the six degenerate conduction band (CB) valleys away from the Brillouin Zone center. The CB valley degeneracy provides an extra degree of freedom to the quantum confined orbital states in silicon, and gives rise to a variety of novel phenomena that strongly affect the electronic structure, transport, and relaxation mechanisms [12][13][14][15][16]. It is therefore important to understand and quantify valley physics and its effect on electronic states.In this letter, we report observations of a novel valley induced phenomena in electronic transport in silicon.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Unlike most materials used for qubits, silicon posses a complex momentum space structure, primarily arising due to the six degenerate conduction band (CB) valleys away from the Brillouin Zone center. The CB valley degeneracy provides an extra degree of freedom to the quantum confined orbital states in silicon, and gives rise to a variety of novel phenomena that strongly affect the electronic structure, transport, and relaxation mechanisms [12][13][14][15][16]. It is therefore important to understand and quantify valley physics and its effect on electronic states.In this letter, we report observations of a novel valley induced phenomena in electronic transport in silicon.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In silicon, valley physics determines qubit relaxation rates 13,17,18 and are predicted to strongly influence two qubit gates 6,7 . Moreover, valley degrees of freedom in AlAs 19 , silicon 20 , diamond 21 , and graphene 22 can play a role similar to spin in condensed matter systems. Encoding of information within valley polarization has been proposed in AlAs 23 , silicon 24, 25 and diamond 21 , and within polarization of chiral valley pseudospin in carbon-based nanostructures [26][27][28] .…”
Section: Fabrication Of Devicesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The data described here were measured at a back gate voltage of 2 V at which the metallic behavour is maximum (See Ref. 29). At this gate voltage, valley splitting is small3 and was therefore neglected.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, previous studies in which the role of intervalley scattering on interactions has been analysed had been limited to systems where this scattering is only weak or moderate so that its effect on the metallic behavour is either absent or restricted to the lowest temperatures232425. Here, we investigate two-dimensionnal electron gases confined in a SOI quantum well2329 (See Methods) where intervalley scattering is an order of magnitude stronger than previously studied so that it modifies the interaction at temperatures up to about 10 K. In addition, compared to Si MOSFETs, interactions are particularly strong in SOI quantum wells because of the reduced dielectric constant of the surrounding SiO 2 . For example, the Wigner-Seitz parameter at the density n = 3.9 × 10 15  m −2 is r s = 8.2 compared to r s = 4.2 in MOSFETs (in Si MOSFETs, while in SOI quantum wells ).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%