2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.jallcom.2017.07.215
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Impact of vertical inter-QDs spacing correlation with the strain energy in a coupled bilayer quantum dot heterostructure

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We previously reported the advantages of having a smaller VIDS in coupled bilayer QDs and its correlation with the strain energy along the z direction in association with the dot density distribution in the coupled InAs QDs. 17 The higher the strain energy that propagates, the larger the QD size in the active layer. We determined the efficiency of strain energy propagation in terms of the vertical strain channel length (Ls).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…We previously reported the advantages of having a smaller VIDS in coupled bilayer QDs and its correlation with the strain energy along the z direction in association with the dot density distribution in the coupled InAs QDs. 17 The higher the strain energy that propagates, the larger the QD size in the active layer. We determined the efficiency of strain energy propagation in terms of the vertical strain channel length (Ls).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Fluctuation in the strain propagation and its coupling potential depends on the vertical inter-QD spacing (VIDS). We previously reported the advantages of having a smaller VIDS in coupled bilayer QDs and its correlation with the strain energy along the z direction in association with the dot density distribution in the coupled InAs QDs . The higher the strain energy that propagates, the larger the QD size in the active layer.…”
Section: Results and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations