2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.desal.2008.01.056
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Impact of wetting agents on the filtration performance of polymeric ultrafiltration membranes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
25
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 43 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
25
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The results presented in the literature indicate that even at advanced stages of filtration, the membranes remain partially non-wetted with water, especially for hydrophobic membranes in microporous parts of the structure [35,37]. This incomplete wetting is caused by the non-uniform pore size distribution in polymer networks produced via phase separation.…”
Section: Background On Wettingmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The results presented in the literature indicate that even at advanced stages of filtration, the membranes remain partially non-wetted with water, especially for hydrophobic membranes in microporous parts of the structure [35,37]. This incomplete wetting is caused by the non-uniform pore size distribution in polymer networks produced via phase separation.…”
Section: Background On Wettingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Membrane wetting is mostly addressed for membrane contactors [30], membrane distillation [27,31,32], microsieves [33], and monoliths [34]. However, literature states that microfiltration and ultrafiltration membrane performance is significantly influenced by its wetting state [35][36][37][38]. Conventionally, commercially available ultrafiltration membranes are pre-filled with a pore stabilizer such as glycerol [39].…”
Section: Background On Wettingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The latter allows for the use of a 50 µm standard graded index multimode lead-in fiber or any other lead-in fiber with a core smaller or equal to 50 µm. The addition of isopropyl alcohol to HF reduces the etching-medium's surface tension, improves the wetting of the gutter region 26 , and thus results in the creation of a deeper gutter. Similarly, the temperature reduction of the etching agent improves the etching selectivity of the P 2 O 5 -doped region 25 .…”
Section: Sensor Design and Manufacturingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, swelling was not expected to be a major reason for the improvement in water flux observed here. The polysulfone supporting layer was hydrophobic and could not be completely wetted by water 23 . Compared to water, ethanol had a lower surface tension, thus, could easily penetrate into the porous structure and prewet the pores of the polysulfone supporting layer for subsequent water permeation 23,24 .…”
Section: Pure Water Flux Under Different Conditionsmentioning
confidence: 99%