IEE Colloquium on Electric Vehicles - A Technology Roadmap for the Future 1998
DOI: 10.1049/ic:19980361
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Impact of wide-scale EV charging on the power supply network

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
13
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The SOC lies between 20% and 100% and battery capacities are 10 kWh. The availability, though simplified, is consistent with earlier findings showing that most secondary cars in Germany are parked at the working location from approximately 6:00 a.m. until 6:00 p.m. [20]. Balancing power can only be offered during this time frame.…”
Section: Phevs As Energy Storage Devicessupporting
confidence: 88%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The SOC lies between 20% and 100% and battery capacities are 10 kWh. The availability, though simplified, is consistent with earlier findings showing that most secondary cars in Germany are parked at the working location from approximately 6:00 a.m. until 6:00 p.m. [20]. Balancing power can only be offered during this time frame.…”
Section: Phevs As Energy Storage Devicessupporting
confidence: 88%
“…Now, the control problem including electricity-and gas network as well as hub equations can be formulated for the system in figure 5 according to (18) with the objective function in (20). Variables indicated with a tilde represent vectors with variable values over the prediction horizon, e.g.…”
Section: U(t) = [P Es (T) P N (T) ]mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…From Figure 7, one might think that since similar utility is being obtained by all agents when bidding a quantity in a range from social optimal value to maximum battery capacity, the agent of any particular type is better off by bidding the maximum quantity. However, precise simulations considering all bids fixed at 23 kWh shows that at such a bid profile, agents of the four types (1,2,3,4) respectively get utilities worth $7.0759, $0, $9.4506 and $0 whereas, if any one agent (depending on it being of type 2, 3 or 4) changes its bid to 22 kWh, it ends up increasing its utility unilaterally to $6.37, $10.2150 or $4.5761 respectively. This clearly shows that in this case, bidding at the maximum quantities is not a Nash equilibrium.…”
Section: Numerical Studymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Effective management of the PEV based electricity demand will be crucial for maintaining the stability and the operational efficiency of the power grid in the near future [1], [2], [3]. Fortunately, PEVs also provide significant flexibility in terms of their energy consumption rates and schedules, which can be utilized towards reducing the variability of the aggregate demand over time.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Based on survey data [3], [4], if every household owns just one PEV in the near future, the peak demand of the grid load from charging the PEVs can increase the peak load by 2.5 times the current peak load. Therefore efficient management of the this excess demand is important for the overall efficiency and stability of the grid [5], [6], [7]. This has led researchers to study the question of coordinating/optimizing the charging of PEVs [8], who have demonstrated that the undesirable effects of PEV charging on the distribution grid can be largely avoided through this coordination.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%