2021
DOI: 10.1080/19317611.2021.1928808
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Impact of Work from Home Policy during the COVID-19 Pandemic on Mental Health and Reproductive Health of Women in Indonesia

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
25
3

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
0
25
3
Order By: Relevance
“…The sudden shift to online classes from traditional teaching while working from home and lack of competencies related to ICT and unavailability of gadgets caused anxiety and other unforeseen mental health consequences and depressions which have led to an effect in productivity at work (Tuzovic and Kabadayi, 2020). This finding contradicted with the findings of Prabowo et al. (2022) who found that WFH policies during pandemic does not affect mental health.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 88%
“…The sudden shift to online classes from traditional teaching while working from home and lack of competencies related to ICT and unavailability of gadgets caused anxiety and other unforeseen mental health consequences and depressions which have led to an effect in productivity at work (Tuzovic and Kabadayi, 2020). This finding contradicted with the findings of Prabowo et al. (2022) who found that WFH policies during pandemic does not affect mental health.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 88%
“…In another study, as many as 84% of the women reported experiencing at least one symptom of a mental health disorder, with low mood, anxiety, and poor sleep being the most prevalent symptoms [30]. In Indonesia, a nationwide survey reported similar findings, with 48% of the women reporting psychological distress and 31.6% reporting menstrual changes [31]. However, these studies included women in the general population and studied the effects of the pandemic itself and the social restriction policy.…”
Section: Plos Onementioning
confidence: 85%
“…A recent study amongst university students in Indonesia found 72% of reported mild depression (24) and a study within the general population reported people under 50 years experienced higher anxiety during the COVID-19 pandemic compared to older participants (25). Another study found 48% of Indonesian women experienced psychological distress as an impact of working from home (26). However, none of these studies employed the K10 to measure psychological distress.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The ten-item scale is used widely for epidemiological and clinical purposes as a simple self-report tool to identify persons who require further assessment for depression and anxiety (16). Scores range from 1 to 50 and were collapsed into four categories: low (10-15); moderate (16)(17)(18)(19)(20)(21); high (22)(23)(24)(25)(26)(27)(28)(29); and very high .…”
Section: Psychological Distress Assessmentmentioning
confidence: 99%