2023
DOI: 10.1016/j.cmi.2023.02.024
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Impact on clinical outcome of follow-up blood cultures and risk factors for persistent bacteraemia in patients with gram-negative bloodstream infections: a systematic review with meta-analysis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

1
8
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
1
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Indeed, an antibiotic therapy tailored on the specific patient characteristics along with a shortening of the duration of antimicrobial exposure are the cornerstones of antimicrobial stewardship programs [ 26 , 27 ]. Although the lower proportion of secondary BSIs associated with an intra-abdominal source in the post-intervention phase could partially explain the significant reduction observed in terms of duration of antibiotic therapy, it is noteworthy that the achievement of an effective source control represents a cornerstone in the management of Gram-negative BSI, and that this issue was strictly associated with FUBC performance [ 28 ]. Considering the higher proportion of patients underwent to FUBCs coupled with a lower proportion of cases in which source control was not performed reported in the post-intervention phase, it could not be ruled out that these factors could have played a major role in shortening antibiotic treatment duration.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Indeed, an antibiotic therapy tailored on the specific patient characteristics along with a shortening of the duration of antimicrobial exposure are the cornerstones of antimicrobial stewardship programs [ 26 , 27 ]. Although the lower proportion of secondary BSIs associated with an intra-abdominal source in the post-intervention phase could partially explain the significant reduction observed in terms of duration of antibiotic therapy, it is noteworthy that the achievement of an effective source control represents a cornerstone in the management of Gram-negative BSI, and that this issue was strictly associated with FUBC performance [ 28 ]. Considering the higher proportion of patients underwent to FUBCs coupled with a lower proportion of cases in which source control was not performed reported in the post-intervention phase, it could not be ruled out that these factors could have played a major role in shortening antibiotic treatment duration.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Considering the higher proportion of patients underwent to FUBCs coupled with a lower proportion of cases in which source control was not performed reported in the post-intervention phase, it could not be ruled out that these factors could have played a major role in shortening antibiotic treatment duration. Although performing FUBCs in Gram-negative infections still remains a debated issue, recent meta-analyses found that this procedure was associated with significant reduction in mortality rate [ 28 , 29 ], thus FUBCs may be recommended for the management of critical patients affected by Gram-negative BSIs. However, for optimizing health resources, a proposed risk score could be applied for promptly identifying cases at high-risk for persistent BSIs who may benefit from FUBCs execution [ 28 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…A predictive risk score of failure in attaining aggressive beta-lactam PK/PD targets in critically ill patients was developed by assigning to each of the meta-analyzed risk factor showing statistical significance a point value corresponding to the natural log of the estimate rounded to the nearest integer, as previously reported [ 19 ]. Positive point values were considered as increasing the risk, whereas the negative ones were considered as being protective against the risk.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Increasingly, data from observational studies and randomized controlled trials (RCTs) support shorter course therapy (7 days) over traditional durations (14 days) for uncomplicated gram-negative BSI, without considering time to bloodstream clearance [ 8–10 ]. On the other hand, recent research has suggested improved clinical outcomes associated with the use of follow-up BCs also in gram-negative BSI [ 11 , 12 ].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%