2016
DOI: 10.1634/theoncologist.2015-0364
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Impact on Patient Management of [18F]-Fluorodeoxyglucose-Positron Emission Tomography (PET) Used for Cancer Diagnosis: Analysis of Data From the National Oncologic PET Registry

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…They showed that the 18 F-FDG PET/CT results could add confidence to clinical likelihood in 28% of patients and correctly downgrade (16%) or upgrade (12%) the clinical score (5). A recent study by Subramaniam et al showed that 18 F-FDG PET has substantial impact in the management of patients with suspected paraneoplastic syndrome and those with cancer of unknown primary origin, resulting in change of the intended management in 25% and 43% of patients (40). Our meta-analysis showed that the diagnostic performance of 18 F-FDG PET/CT for the detection of underlying malignancy in patients with suspected paraneoplastic syndrome is comparable with its general performance in patients with cancer of unknown primary origin.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They showed that the 18 F-FDG PET/CT results could add confidence to clinical likelihood in 28% of patients and correctly downgrade (16%) or upgrade (12%) the clinical score (5). A recent study by Subramaniam et al showed that 18 F-FDG PET has substantial impact in the management of patients with suspected paraneoplastic syndrome and those with cancer of unknown primary origin, resulting in change of the intended management in 25% and 43% of patients (40). Our meta-analysis showed that the diagnostic performance of 18 F-FDG PET/CT for the detection of underlying malignancy in patients with suspected paraneoplastic syndrome is comparable with its general performance in patients with cancer of unknown primary origin.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Reimbursement by the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services for 18 F-FDG PET was based on complex decision-tree sensitivity analyses for cost effectiveness (5) and on large, national, prospective studies evaluating changes in management (6). Until the anonymous authors provide solid arguments, we will be relentless in opposing such actions.…”
Section: Humana and 18 F-fdg Pet/ct: Another Sequel To The Injustice Of Being Judged By The Errors Of Othersmentioning
confidence: 99%