Impact resistance of composite circular corrugated core sandwich structures

Abstract

In this study, we used HyperMesh and LS-DYNA software, based on the MAT54 model and Chang-Chang failure criterion, to establish a finite element model of composite corrugated sandwich structures, and introduced a progressive damage model. The impact resistance of the corrugated sandwich structure was studied by analysing the residual velocity of the projectile, the impact force of the target plate, and the failure mode. The impact resistance of the corrugated sandwich structure was analysed when four types of composite materials were used as the front and back panels of the corrugated sandwich structure. The results showed that, compared with the metal aluminium panel, the impact resistance of the structure was high when ultra-high molecular weight polyethylene (UHMWPE) fibres were used as the positive panel. When the composites were used as the back panel, although the residual velocity was lower than metal aluminium, the impact force was higher than metal aluminium, with more serious damage form of the target plate. Thus, the impact resistance of composite front panel/metal aluminium core/metal aluminium back panel sandwich structure was better than the all-metal aluminium corrugated sandwich structures. The results of this paper can provide a reference for the design of novel lightweight multifunctional structures.

Numerical Analysis of the Impact Resistance of Composite A-Shaped Sandwich Structures

“…Furthermore, due to the carbon fiber composite sandwich structure’s chemical stability, corrosion resistance, and lightweight properties [ 16 ], it has been widely used in the marine, aerospace, and automotive sectors. Zhang [ 17 ] investigated the impact resistance of corrugated sandwich structures and found that when ultra-high molecular weight polyethylene (UHMWPE) fibers were used as the front panel, the structures had high impact resistance. When the composite material is used as the back panel, although the residual velocity is lower than that of metallic aluminum, the impact force is higher than that of metallic aluminum and the damage form of the target panel is more severe.…”