2017
DOI: 10.1088/1361-665x/aa973e
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Impact source localisation in aerospace composite structures

Abstract: The most commonly encountered type of damage in aircraft composite structures is caused by lowvelocity impacts due to foreign objects such as hail stones, tool drops and bird strikes. Often these events can cause severe internal material damage that is difficult to detect and may lead to a significant reduction of the structure's strength and fatigue life. For this reason there is an urgent need to develop structural health monitoring systems able to localise low-velocity impacts in both metallic and composite… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
58
0
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 60 publications
(59 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
0
58
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The impact localisation algorithm was originally developed by Ciampa and Meo, and it was recently improved by De Simone et al with a linearisation process of the system of nonlinear equations necessary to obtain the coordinates of the AE source and the velocity of propagating waves. With reference to Figure , the proposed impact localisation algorithm requires four PZT receiver transducers surface bonded on the test component.…”
Section: Impact Localisation Algorithmmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…The impact localisation algorithm was originally developed by Ciampa and Meo, and it was recently improved by De Simone et al with a linearisation process of the system of nonlinear equations necessary to obtain the coordinates of the AE source and the velocity of propagating waves. With reference to Figure , the proposed impact localisation algorithm requires four PZT receiver transducers surface bonded on the test component.…”
Section: Impact Localisation Algorithmmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Considering one of the sensors as the “reference sensor,” the following formula relates the travel time to reach the reference sensor, t ref , with the time differences, Δt ref, j , between the reference sensor and the other receiver transducers: tj=tref±Δtref,j2.5emj=1,,3. Substituting Equation into Equation , it leads to the following system of four nonlinear equations: {xjxAE2+yjyAE2=[)false(tref±Δtref,jcgfalse]2xrefxAE2+yrefyAE2=trefcg2,1.5emj=1,,3, which can be solved for the four unknowns ( x AE , y AE , t ref , c g ) by following the linearisation process reported in De Simone et al Each wireless node was designed to continuously acquire data from the ADC and seek for a signal sample crossing a predefined threshold (see Section 3.2). The time information, t i , was obtained through a time synchronisation of the ADC sampling clock with a clock coherent with the GNSS signal available from the GNSS receiver.…”
Section: Impact Localisation Algorithmmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…SHM algorithms for AE localization in composite materials typically rely on the time of arrival (TOA) estimation (Ciampa and Meo, 2010b;Kundu, 2012;Kundu et al, 2012;Emanuele et al, 2017;Seno et al, 2019). However, TOA-based techniques require a relatively large number of receiver transducers measuring the coherent part of the wave field (ballistic wave).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%