2015
DOI: 10.1038/ngeo2369
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Impact vaporization of planetesimal cores in the late stages of planet formation

Abstract: Di erentiated planetesimals delivered iron-rich material to the Earth and Moon in high-velocity collisions at the end stages of accretion. The physical process of accreting this late material has implications for the geochemical evolution of the Earth-Moon system and the timing of Earth's core formation 1-3 . However, the fraction of a planetesimal's iron core that is vaporized by an impact is not well constrained as a result of iron's poorly understood equation of state. Here we determine the entropy in the s… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
69
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 74 publications
(70 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
1
69
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A range of processes such as core formation, impact induced element loss during accretion via collisional erosion (O'Neill and Palme, 2008), vaporization (e.g., Kraus et al, 2015) and late addition might have influenced the depletion trend of volatile elements in the BSE. On the other hand, previous estimates of In abundances in the BSE were based on limited data, and different methods suggested different abundances (McDonough and Sun, 1995;Witt-Eickschen et al, 2009;Yi et al, 1995Yi et al, , 2000.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A range of processes such as core formation, impact induced element loss during accretion via collisional erosion (O'Neill and Palme, 2008), vaporization (e.g., Kraus et al, 2015) and late addition might have influenced the depletion trend of volatile elements in the BSE. On the other hand, previous estimates of In abundances in the BSE were based on limited data, and different methods suggested different abundances (McDonough and Sun, 1995;Witt-Eickschen et al, 2009;Yi et al, 1995Yi et al, , 2000.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In fact, the arguments given here for conditions following somewhat smaller impactors (see Table 4.1) would also apply to the MFI, with suitable modifications to adjust for the magnitude of the event. Although MFI scenarios suggest that the core of the impactor is largely retained by Earth (Cameron 1997;Canup 2004), it would be surprising if some fraction of the metallic inventory were not vaporized during the impact (Kraus et al 2015). If as little as 10 % of the core were vaporized (and added to vaporized ferrous iron from the silicate shell) the amount of hydrogen produced by reaction with water would be at least as much as that produced in the smaller event of a 1000 km impactor (Table 4.1).…”
Section: Chapter 4 Degassing Processes and Chemistrymentioning
confidence: 98%
“…If the Moon's surface remained active for 50-100 MY following the MFI, or if lunar reaccretion from the post-MFI "cloud" were delayed for a similar interval (perhaps due to tidal disruption), any late veneer material added to the Moon would have been simply mixed in before the solidification of the lunar surface, including the lunar highland rocks. Alternatively, the vaporization of impactors on the moon might have resulted in vapor clouds that would simply escape from Moon's lower gravity (Kraus et al 2015). For Earth the surface would have stabilized rapidly, the presumed post-MFI magma ocean solidifying in about 20 million years or less (Sleep 2010).…”
Section: Chapter 4 Degassing Processes and Chemistrymentioning
confidence: 98%
“…In case of large (up to ≈ 10 3 km) impactors [Raymond et al, 2013] melting and evaporation of impactor, crustal and mantle materials are the principal processes [Kraus et al, 2015]. To prevent fractionation of NM, special additional features of these processes are considered.…”
Section: The Late Accretionmentioning
confidence: 99%