Search citation statements
Paper Sections
Citation Types
Year Published
Publication Types
Relationship
Authors
Journals
ObjectivesWe aimed to analyze the episodes of esophageal food bolus impaction (EFI) occurred over a time of 15 years in children admitted to a large pediatric emergency department (PED), documenting their clinical presentation, underlying pathology, management, biopsy rate, and follow‐up visits. Additionally, to combine our institutional experience with the existing literature, a comprehensive review was conducted.MethodsWe reviewed the medical records of all children presenting to our PED with EFI from 2010 to 2024. The comprehensive review was guided by the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta‐Analysis statement for systematic reviews. Electronic databases including PubMed/Medline and EMBASE were screened. The data obtained was synthesized to map out the actual status and current literature on pediatric EFI.ResultsWe identified 54 cases of EFI. Overall, 22 patients (41%) had underlying pathology. Previous episodes were reported in 14 cases (26%). Urgent endoscopy was performed in 31 cases (57%). The presence of underlying pathology was associated with the need for endoscopic removal (p = 0.013), as well as the history of previous episodes (p = 0.016). Biopsies were performed in 14 cases (26%). Pediatric gastroenterologists showed a higher rate of performed biopsies compared to surgeons, as well as higher rate of follow‐up visits. An underlying disease was found during later clinical follow‐up in 5 out of 54 cases of EFI (9%). A comprehensive review of 16 studies revealed high rates of underlying pathology and low rates of biopsies and follow‐up visits among children with EFI.ConclusionIncreased vigilance in identifying underlying pathologies in children with EFI is crucial. The importance of performing biopsies, regardless of prior anatomical conditions, and the need for ongoing follow‐up to ensure timely and accurate diagnoses should be addressed through shared protocols.
ObjectivesWe aimed to analyze the episodes of esophageal food bolus impaction (EFI) occurred over a time of 15 years in children admitted to a large pediatric emergency department (PED), documenting their clinical presentation, underlying pathology, management, biopsy rate, and follow‐up visits. Additionally, to combine our institutional experience with the existing literature, a comprehensive review was conducted.MethodsWe reviewed the medical records of all children presenting to our PED with EFI from 2010 to 2024. The comprehensive review was guided by the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta‐Analysis statement for systematic reviews. Electronic databases including PubMed/Medline and EMBASE were screened. The data obtained was synthesized to map out the actual status and current literature on pediatric EFI.ResultsWe identified 54 cases of EFI. Overall, 22 patients (41%) had underlying pathology. Previous episodes were reported in 14 cases (26%). Urgent endoscopy was performed in 31 cases (57%). The presence of underlying pathology was associated with the need for endoscopic removal (p = 0.013), as well as the history of previous episodes (p = 0.016). Biopsies were performed in 14 cases (26%). Pediatric gastroenterologists showed a higher rate of performed biopsies compared to surgeons, as well as higher rate of follow‐up visits. An underlying disease was found during later clinical follow‐up in 5 out of 54 cases of EFI (9%). A comprehensive review of 16 studies revealed high rates of underlying pathology and low rates of biopsies and follow‐up visits among children with EFI.ConclusionIncreased vigilance in identifying underlying pathologies in children with EFI is crucial. The importance of performing biopsies, regardless of prior anatomical conditions, and the need for ongoing follow‐up to ensure timely and accurate diagnoses should be addressed through shared protocols.
No abstract
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.