Impacted maxillary canine in unilateral cleft lip and palate: A literature review

Alqerban, Ali

doi:10.1016/j.sdentj.2018.11.001

Cited by 7 publications

(3 citation statements)

References 55 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…The frequency of canines impaction in patients with CL/P is determined in the literature as between 0% and 58% [3,[16][17][18][19][20]. Lower frequency of impaction was observed in the groups above 50 persons (0-35%), while the results up to 58% were obtained in the groups with less than 50 patients [21][22][23][24].…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Frequency of Additional Congenital Dental Anomalies in Children with Cleft Lip, Alveolar and Palate

Pastuszak

Dunin-Wilczyńska

Lasota

2020

JCM

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The aim of the study was to assess the risk of incidence of additional congenital dental anomalies in children with nonsyndromic cleft lip, alveolar and/without palate (CL/P). Hypodontia, hyperdontia and canines impaction was recognized. From patients with CL/P treated at the Clinic of Congenital Facial Deformities in Chair and Department of Jaw Orthopedics Medical University of Lublin, 56 subjects were randomly selected. On the panoramic radiographs taken at the age of 8–12 years, the angle of upper unerupted canines was measured using Westerlund’s recommendations. The supernumerary teeth and hypodontia were checked. The procedures: maxillary expansion, secondary alveolar bone graft (SABG) and extraction of primary canines were noted. The frequency of canines impaction was 5.36%. Hypodontia was found in 37.5% of patients; hyperdontia was present in 23.21% of patients. No influence of procedures (expansion of the maxilla, SABG, deciduous canines extraction) on permanent maxillary canine eruption was proved. Patients with CL/P are exposed to the unfavorable position of unerupted maxillary canines most frequently in the cleft area of complete cleft. Maxillary lateral incisor on the cleft side is most frequently affected with congenital anomaly. Hypodontia and hyperdontia do not influence maxillary canine impaction. Good clinical result was achieved with an applied approach, which should be widely introduced.

show abstract

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Frequency of Additional Congenital Dental Anomalies in Children with Cleft Lip, Alveolar and Palate

Pastuszak

Dunin-Wilczyńska

Lasota

2020

JCM

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…In contrast, reports of the incidence of maxillary canine impaction in patients with CLP range from 4.4% to 35% (Alqerban, 2019;Enemark et al, 2001;Matsui et al, 2005;Tortora et al, 2008;Westerlund et al, 2014). This wide range indicates the need for further studies to understand the etiology of maxillary canine impaction in patients with CLP.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 95%

Factors Contributing to Canine Impaction in Patients With Unilateral Cleft Lip and Palate Undergoing Alveolar Bone Grafts

Hoang

Sheller

Greenlee

et al. 2023

Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

“…Teeth impaction, especially in the cleft area, is a common problem. The canine tooth is the most frequently impacted in cleft patients [17]. This condition can also be associated with dentigerous cysts, further complicating the treatment [18].…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Dental Anomalies in Maxillary Incisors and Canines among Patients with Total Cleft Lip and Palate

Paradowska-Stolarz

Kawala

2023

Applied Sciences

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Cleft lip and palate is the most common asymmetric congenital condition of the orofacial region, which also finds its reflection in dental anomalies. The aim of the study was to present the dental asymmetries of the front region of the maxilla in cleft patients. Materials and Methods: We analyzed plaster casts and panoramic X-rays of 154 patients with total clefts and 151 healthy individuals. The cleft patients’ age ranged between 7.1 and 20 years (mean 13.18). The control group had a similar age range (7.1 and 20 years, mean 13.44). The digital caliper was used to measure the width of the teeth. Each measurement was performed three times each. Results: Most of the dental anomalies among cleft patients referred to the lateral incisors and were focused on the cleft side. The asymmetry of the incisors is reflected both in the number of teeth in the cleft region and their width. The lateral incisor was missing twice as frequently on the cleft side of the individual. If present, the lateral incisor was usually ±1.5 mm narrower than the incisor on the opposite side. In bilateral clefts, dental anomalies occurred more frequently on the left side. Conclusions: Dental problems occurred more frequently in patients with total cleft lip and palate than in healthy individuals. The most commonly affected teeth were the lateral incisors. The width of the lateral incisors was reduced in cleft patients—showing a smaller mesiodistal dimension on the cleft side.

show abstract

Impacted maxillary canine in unilateral cleft lip and palate: A literature review

Cited by 7 publications

References 55 publications

Frequency of Additional Congenital Dental Anomalies in Children with Cleft Lip, Alveolar and Palate

Frequency of Additional Congenital Dental Anomalies in Children with Cleft Lip, Alveolar and Palate

Factors Contributing to Canine Impaction in Patients With Unilateral Cleft Lip and Palate Undergoing Alveolar Bone Grafts

Dental Anomalies in Maxillary Incisors and Canines among Patients with Total Cleft Lip and Palate

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About