2016
DOI: 10.4317/medoral.21337
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Impacted maxillary canines and root resorption of adjacent teeth: A retrospective observational study

Abstract: BackgroundThe prevalence of impacted maxillary canine is reported to be between 1% and 3%. The lack of monitoring and the delay in the treatment of the impacted canine can cause different complications such as: displacement of adjacent teeth, loss of vitality of neighbouring teeth, shortening of the dental arch, follicular cysts, canine ankylosis, recurrent infections, recurrent pain, internal resorption of the canine and the adjacent teeth, external resorption of the canine and the adjacent teeth, combination… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

8
32
1
3

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(44 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
8
32
1
3
Order By: Relevance
“…The current results found no significant association between the size of ɑ angle and incidence or severity of root resorption in the adjacent lateral incisor, which was in agreement with the results of Guarnieri et al [22]. They assessed the angles between the longitudinal axis of canine and the occlusal line, midline and the longitudinal axis of lateral incisor and confirmed the presence of a correlation between the angle formed by the longitudinal axis of canine and longitudinal axis of lateral incisor with the severity of root resorption of lateral incisor.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The current results found no significant association between the size of ɑ angle and incidence or severity of root resorption in the adjacent lateral incisor, which was in agreement with the results of Guarnieri et al [22]. They assessed the angles between the longitudinal axis of canine and the occlusal line, midline and the longitudinal axis of lateral incisor and confirmed the presence of a correlation between the angle formed by the longitudinal axis of canine and longitudinal axis of lateral incisor with the severity of root resorption of lateral incisor.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…This study assessed the relationship of ɑ and ß angles of maxillary impacted canines with maxillary lateral incisor root resorption on panoramic radiographs and CBCTscans. Of all cases of canine impaction, 14 (35%) were in the right and 26 (65%) were in the left side, which was in agreement with previous results [19,22,23], all conducted on the Iranian population. The age range of patients from 11 to 45 years is an important limitation of the study.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…Gubernaculum dentis is our biggest source of information about eruption (19). If there are no teeth on palpation and bone deficiency until the age of 10 years, radiographic examination is required (20). For this purpose, radiographs such as periapical, occlusal, panoramic, anteroposterior, lateral cephalometric, and submentovertex are used (21).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…26 Root length measurements of adjacent teeth can be done using panoramic radiograph but recently, cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) has been proposed as an alternative to conventional CT in the diagnosis and treatment planning of impacted teeth. 9,27 The aim of this study to investigate the prevalence and pattern of impacted maxillary canine among patient attending a dental hospital in Attarkhel and to evaluate the existing relation between impaction of canine and anomaly of adjacent teeth. More number of females showed maxillary canine impaction while mandibular canine impaction showed no gender predominance (Table 3).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%