2016
DOI: 10.1590/1809-2950/16659423042016
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Impacto da doença de Parkinson na performance do equilíbrio em diferentes demandas atencionais

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
0
1
4

Year Published

2018
2018
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
1
0
1
4
Order By: Relevance
“…In this context, vision plays a major role in postural control and contributes to regulating postural stability during quiet standing [ 31 ]. Our results did not contradict this statement nor previous results examining the tandem stance in pwPD [ 32 ], where visual deprivation increased postural instability, as evidence by higher COP displacement, velocity, ellipse area and RMS, in comparison to open eyes condition.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 64%
“…In this context, vision plays a major role in postural control and contributes to regulating postural stability during quiet standing [ 31 ]. Our results did not contradict this statement nor previous results examining the tandem stance in pwPD [ 32 ], where visual deprivation increased postural instability, as evidence by higher COP displacement, velocity, ellipse area and RMS, in comparison to open eyes condition.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 64%
“…Terra and colleagues 28 It is worth noting that in the present study, and in agreement with the data in the literature, the elderly participants with PD had the longest completion time for the simple mobility test (TUG) and had the lowest ambulation scores, suggesting that they had the worst mobility and dynamic balance.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…Scores z compostos dos quatro testes de memória de trabalho durante a estimulação ativa anodal esquerda (t11 = 3,9, p = 0,003, ds de Cohen = 0,52) e estimulação ativa anodal direita (t11 = 2,7, p = 0,019, ds de Cohen = 0,46) foram melhores que a atuação da estimulação falsa, mas não houve entre as duas condições ativas diferença significante (t11 = 0,60, p = 0,563). Os testes de acompanhamento de Wilcoxon revelaram que o desempenho do TBA após a estimulação anodal esquerda não foi significativamente diferente do desempenho do TBA após a estimulação simulada (z11 = 1,63, p =0,102, r =0, 24,d de Cohen =0,27), mas o desempenho do TBA após a estimulação anodal direita foi melhor do que a de simulação (z11 = 2,26, p = 0,024, r = 0,33, ds de Cohen = 0,46). Nenhum participante apresentou eventos adversos.…”
Section: Resultsunclassified