1999
DOI: 10.1016/s0300-8932(99)74971-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Impacto del infarto de miocardio en la situación laboral de los pacientes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

0
3
0
1

Year Published

2003
2003
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
3
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Other sources like the Spanish National Social Security Institute (INSS) set the mean time for return to work after AMI at 90 days, ranging between 60 and 120 days depending on the anatomical location of the event and the diagnosis, with 30 days for both angina pectoris and old myocardial infarction [10]. Other studies of sick leave in the general population report longer periods and a wide variability, ranging from 189 days in the study by Jiménez [8] to 244 days in the study by Gutiérrez Morlote [9] and to a mean of 255 days in the Andalusia study protocol [7]. …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Other sources like the Spanish National Social Security Institute (INSS) set the mean time for return to work after AMI at 90 days, ranging between 60 and 120 days depending on the anatomical location of the event and the diagnosis, with 30 days for both angina pectoris and old myocardial infarction [10]. Other studies of sick leave in the general population report longer periods and a wide variability, ranging from 189 days in the study by Jiménez [8] to 244 days in the study by Gutiérrez Morlote [9] and to a mean of 255 days in the Andalusia study protocol [7]. …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Lastly, an important aspect to be considered is the timing of the return to work. Levine et al say that traditionally, there was a wide timeframe for return to work after an acute coronary event [9, 21, 24]; however, this recommendation is now obsolete as it does not take into account the major improvements in acute therapies, preventive treatments and cardiac rehabilitation that have been achieved in recent years. Modern guidelines, though not entirely clear, have shortened this timeframe to 1–3 months [25].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Studies of such patients have examined the contribution of a wide range of sociodemographic, vocational, and medical variables to these patients’ reemployment. A survey of empirical studies of the qualitative and quantitative aspects of employment after an AMI, published between 1988 and 2003, uncovered 46 investigations [3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 44, 45, 46, 47, 48]. An examination of these investigations revealed the following limitations: (1) most studies involved selected samples of participants (e.g., randomized intervention studies), (2) most studies examined employment within the first year after AMI, (3) most studies did not distinguish between employment status, resumption of employment, and maintenance of employment, (4) few studies investigated long-term maintenance of employment after AMI, (5) few studies were longitudinal community cohort studies, and (6) most studies included participants who had reached an age at which employment is no longer central.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…La mayoría de estudios publicados incluyen muestras muy pequeñas y con frecuencia están circunscritos a un ámbito local (provincia, comunidad autónoma), por lo que su potencia estadística es limitada 8,9 . Además, la mayoría de los estudios publicados son de los años noventa y, por lo tanto, no recogen los importantes avances terapéuticos desarrollados en la última década en el tratamiento de la cardiopatía isquémica.…”
Section: Introductionunclassified