2014
DOI: 10.5154/r.rchsza.2013.10.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Impacto hidrológico del cambio de uso del suelo de un pastizal nativo a praderas de zacate buffel (Pennisetum ciliare L.)

Abstract: El objetivo de este trabajo es documentar el impacto del establecimiento de praderas de zacate buffel (Pennisetum ciliare L.) en terrenos de pastizal, sobre la tasa de infiltración del suelo. El estudio se estableció en el área de San Luis del Cordero, Dgo. Para determinar el impacto se realizaron pruebas de infiltración con un simulador de lluvia en praderas de zacate buffel y en terrenos de pastizal nativo. Las simulaciones se realizaron en condiciones secas y húmedas (24 horas después de las simulaciones en… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
0
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 14 publications
0
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The growth form of bunchgrasses can also lead to the self-shading of their foliage, reducing the overall amount of the photosynthetically active leaf area [19]. Conversely, the foliage of sod-forming grasses tends to be more abundant and continuous due to their spreading (rhizomatous) nature, contributing to greater overall coverage of foliage [20] compared to bunchgrasses. In this context, the canopies of sod-forming grasses are comparatively denser (i.e., more foliage or green matter) than bunchgrasses, which, for our research purposes, was considered to have a sparse canopy.…”
Section: Forage Data Collectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The growth form of bunchgrasses can also lead to the self-shading of their foliage, reducing the overall amount of the photosynthetically active leaf area [19]. Conversely, the foliage of sod-forming grasses tends to be more abundant and continuous due to their spreading (rhizomatous) nature, contributing to greater overall coverage of foliage [20] compared to bunchgrasses. In this context, the canopies of sod-forming grasses are comparatively denser (i.e., more foliage or green matter) than bunchgrasses, which, for our research purposes, was considered to have a sparse canopy.…”
Section: Forage Data Collectionmentioning
confidence: 99%