2016
DOI: 10.1111/maps.12710
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Impacts into quartz sand: Crater formation, shock metamorphism, and ejecta distribution in laboratory experiments and numerical models

Abstract: We investigated the ejection mechanics by a complementary approach of cratering experiments, including the microscopic analysis of material sampled from these experiments, and 2‐D numerical modeling of vertical impacts. The study is based on cratering experiments in quartz sand targets performed at the NASA Ames Vertical Gun Range. In these experiments, the preimpact location in the target and the final position of ejecta was determined by using color‐coded sand and a catcher system for the ejecta. The results… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

6
60
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 62 publications
(66 citation statements)
references
References 52 publications
(129 reference statements)
6
60
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We rebin the launch positions of all tracers with an interval of 5 km (i.e., 0.1 in dimensionless units) for the statistical studies to see the difference between the warm and cold cases. In both cases, we find that the ejecta launch velocity decreases with increasing launch position as expected from the laboratory impact experiments (Cintala et al, ; Housen & Holsapple, ) and other numerical models (e.g., Wünnemann et al, ). Our results show that the ejecta launch angle depends on the target properties, whereas the ejecta launch velocity does not.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 86%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We rebin the launch positions of all tracers with an interval of 5 km (i.e., 0.1 in dimensionless units) for the statistical studies to see the difference between the warm and cold cases. In both cases, we find that the ejecta launch velocity decreases with increasing launch position as expected from the laboratory impact experiments (Cintala et al, ; Housen & Holsapple, ) and other numerical models (e.g., Wünnemann et al, ). Our results show that the ejecta launch angle depends on the target properties, whereas the ejecta launch velocity does not.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 86%
“…In addition, small difference in density between ejecta and target would not significantly change the ejecta thickness distribution. This approach has been validated against laboratory impact experiments (Wünnemann et al, ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This approach has been well tested and compared against experimental data (Wünnemann et al. ). In this study, we investigate the ejecta distribution for the biggest Morasko crater neglecting any interaction with the atmosphere and with the ejecta curtains from nearby craters.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This approach is similar to that in Collins et al . [] and has been validated against laboratory impact experiments into sand [ Wünnemann et al ., ]. The entrainment of local material into the ejecta blanket upon landing is not taken into account.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%