2001
DOI: 10.1674/0003-0031(2001)146[0217:ioafos]2.0.co;2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Impacts of a Flood on Small Mammal Populations of Lower Missouri River Floodplain Forests

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
27
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
27
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Arboreal species are at an advantage, experiencing less decline after floods in the forest (Golet et al 2011). Best known in this respect is whitefooted mouse Peromyscus leucopus (Rafinesque, 1818), a species which seems to be not affected by floods (Ruffer 1961;Blem & Blem 1975;Williams et al 2001). Myodes glareolus and A. flavicollis may survive even major floods, while M. arvalis tends to be the most affected (Jacob 2003).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Arboreal species are at an advantage, experiencing less decline after floods in the forest (Golet et al 2011). Best known in this respect is whitefooted mouse Peromyscus leucopus (Rafinesque, 1818), a species which seems to be not affected by floods (Ruffer 1961;Blem & Blem 1975;Williams et al 2001). Myodes glareolus and A. flavicollis may survive even major floods, while M. arvalis tends to be the most affected (Jacob 2003).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…By contrast, natural floodplains usually abound in forests revealing a gradient of vegetation from softwood to hardwood that provide a heterogeneous landscape as well as a large diversity of biological habitats (Petts and Amoros 1996;Ward et al 2002). Research in these floodplain ecosystems has mainly focused on riparian vegetation biodiversity, succession and productivity (Schnitzler-Lenoble 2007) but also on amphibians' biodiversity (Tockner et al 2006), birds (McGinness et al 2010) and mammals (Williams et al 2001). Invertebrates and benthic fauna were also described (Korte et al 2010).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Because of the difficulty in predicting when and where a flood will occur, the majority of information gathered on the topic was not acquired as part of a designed project, but instead the result of studies that were in progress when flooding occurred-as was the case with our investigation. Most published information on the topic is based on studies and observations of small mammals (Anderson et al 2000;Batzli 1977;McCarley 1959;Stickel 1948;Wijnhoven et al 2006;Williams et al 2001;Yeager and Anderson 1944) with the exception of opossums (Didelphis virginiana; Yeager and Anderson 1944), raccoons (Procyon lotor; Gehrt et al 1993;Yeager and Anderson 1944), and white-tailed deer (Odocoileus virginianus; Samuel and Glazener 1970).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Survival and recolonization rates during and post-flood likely are species-dependent and based on a variety of interactive factors: behavioral patterns, social interactions, life-history requisites, and flood duration and severity (Blair 1939;Batzli 1977;Gehrt et al 1993;McCarley 1959;Williams et al 2001). Species with arboreal capabilities (e.g., Peromyscus spp., fox squirrels [Sciurus niger], opossums, and raccoons) initially are known or presumed to take refuge in trees located within the floodplain (Anderson et al 2000;Batzli 1977;Gehrt et al 1993;McCarley 1959;Stickel 1948;Williams et al 2001 and Anderson 1944) but may perish or move beyond flooded areas if the flood persists for a long duration (Anderson et al 2000;Blair 1939 Samuel and Glazener 1970).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation