2004
DOI: 10.1029/2004gl019852
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Impacts of anthropogenic heat on regional climate patterns

Abstract: [1] Four different simulations of a winter period in Central Europe are carried out to investigate the principle effect of anthropogenic heat release from the highly industrialized and populated Ruhrarea region (Germany) on regional climate conditions. The results reveal a permanent warming due to anthropogenic heat emissions over affected areas ranging from 0.15 K over land area with an additional 2 W m À2 anthropogenic heat flux up to 0.5 K over the Ruhrarea with additional 20 W m À2 anthropogenic heat flux.… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
76
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 95 publications
(77 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
1
76
0
Order By: Relevance
“…By way of illustration, the average energy consumption for Germany is 1.3 Wm −2 , for Japan it is 2.9 Wm −2 , for the Netherlands it is almost 4 Wm −2 , while for certain industrialized regions it can easily be 20-70 Wm −2 (IIASA, 2003;Crutzen, 2004). Temperature perturbations of up to 0.9 K were found by Block et al (2004) for a 90-day simulation of a constant surface flux of 2 Wm −2 over Europe's land areas, which suggest that the significant regional temperature trend enhancements discussed in this work and in Paper I could be partly explained by this process. In general, the presence of surface warming processes would require a better understanding of the structure of the ABL (both during the day and night), the effect of surface processes on it and the possibility that it affects much larger regions through advection and transport.…”
Section: Summary and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…By way of illustration, the average energy consumption for Germany is 1.3 Wm −2 , for Japan it is 2.9 Wm −2 , for the Netherlands it is almost 4 Wm −2 , while for certain industrialized regions it can easily be 20-70 Wm −2 (IIASA, 2003;Crutzen, 2004). Temperature perturbations of up to 0.9 K were found by Block et al (2004) for a 90-day simulation of a constant surface flux of 2 Wm −2 over Europe's land areas, which suggest that the significant regional temperature trend enhancements discussed in this work and in Paper I could be partly explained by this process. In general, the presence of surface warming processes would require a better understanding of the structure of the ABL (both during the day and night), the effect of surface processes on it and the possibility that it affects much larger regions through advection and transport.…”
Section: Summary and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently, Block et al (2004) investigated the influence of 'anthropogenic heat' on surface temperatures, which is released by densely populated industrialized areas using a (regional) climate model. The proposed physical mechanism is that energy -which is consumed in large quantities in these areas -is a conserved quantity in any physical system, and at some point this energy will be released into the atmosphere in the form of a direct near-surface temperature (energy) perturbation.…”
Section: Summary and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Anthropogenic heat (AH) can increase turbulent fluxes in sensible and latent heat (Oke, 1988), implying that it can modulate local and regional meteorological processes (Ichinose et al, 1999;Block et al, 2004;Fan and Sailor, 2005;Ferguson and Woodbury, 2007;Zhu et al, 2010;Feng et al, 2012Feng et al, , 2014Menberg et al, 2013;Ryu et al, 2013;Wu and Yang, 2013;Bohnenstengel et al, 2014;Chen et al, 2014a;Meng et al, 2011;Yu et al, 2014;Xie et al, 2016) and thereby exert an important influence on the formation and the distribution of ozone (Ryu et al, 2013;Yu et al, 2014;Xie et al, 2016) as well as aerosols (Yu et al, 2014;Xie et al, 2016).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This correction is uncertain, as the near-surface temperature gradient can be affected by other causes, such as urbanization (e.g. Block et al, 2004;Ferguson and Woodbury, 2004) or groundwater flow (Smith and Chapman, 1983). Such effects should not affect our correction to first order.…”
Section: Comparison Of the Underground And Surface Temperaturesmentioning
confidence: 99%