2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.trd.2012.05.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Impacts of biodiesel blending on freight emissions in the Midwestern United States

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

1
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In both scenarios, sulfur dioxide (SO 2 ) emissions increase, up to 12% in the T-F scenario. In 2005, fuel standards for highway diesel contained 500 ppm sulfur, , while railroad diesel contained 2600 ppm, , so increased freight rail yields increased SO 2 emissions. New EPA regulations are stepping down both highway and rail diesel sulfur levels to 15 ppm by 2015.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In both scenarios, sulfur dioxide (SO 2 ) emissions increase, up to 12% in the T-F scenario. In 2005, fuel standards for highway diesel contained 500 ppm sulfur, , while railroad diesel contained 2600 ppm, , so increased freight rail yields increased SO 2 emissions. New EPA regulations are stepping down both highway and rail diesel sulfur levels to 15 ppm by 2015.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The overall structure of our study design is presented in Figure , with each component discussed in detail in Supporting Information, section S1. We have developed a policy-relevant emissions inventory (WIFE version 1.5; earlier version discussed in Johnston et al, 2012) to allow for multicorridor, multicommodity, multipollutant emissions inventory calculations. WIFE incorporates HDDV freight activity from the Federal Highway Administration’s (FHWA) Freight Analysis Framework (FAF) version 2.2 , database and HDDV emissions factors from the EPA’s MOBILE6.2 emissions model. , Freight rail emissions were calculated on the basis of published rail emissions factors (see Table S3 and section S3 in the Supporting Information).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%